Examination of New Zealand’s Use of Mixed-Member Proportional System

Faith Howard
{"title":"Examination of New Zealand’s Use of Mixed-Member Proportional System","authors":"Faith Howard","doi":"10.59604/1046-2309.1030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines New Zealand's most recent general election to determine the composition of the 52nd Parliament, which occurred on September 23rd, 2017. By examining this election, one can see how New Zealander's are able to achieve more accurate and diverse representation through their electoral system. This diversity in representation is achieved through the two votes that voters cast when they elected their representatives locally through the candidate vote and by their political party preference vote under the mixed-member proportional electoral system. New Zealand's practice of mixed-member proportional, gives their voters an advantage in the election process that voters under other electoral systems do not benefit from widely when it comes to achieving a more accurate minority representation. The primary advantage that voters achieve under the mixed-member system is that it is a hybrid system allowing voters to have majoritarian representation and proportional representation. Majoritarian representation is achieved through the candidate vote, which voters cast as they would under the electoral system First Past the Post, which awards a seat in the legislature to the candidate who receives the most votes. However, the added benefit of the mixed-member proportional system is it also provides voters with proportional representation through their party vote. Also, with the addition of the party vote, voters feel more inclined to vote for their actual preference because they know as long as their party meets the required threshold, they will receive a seat. The benefits that New Zealand voters receive under the mixed-member proportional system are presented in the outcome of their election with New Zealand's two most dominant parties, the National Party and the Labour Party receiving most of the seats with representation for minority parties. This paper demonstrates the value of mixed-member proportional for achieving desired representation.","PeriodicalId":354997,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Economics and Politics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Economics and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59604/1046-2309.1030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines New Zealand's most recent general election to determine the composition of the 52nd Parliament, which occurred on September 23rd, 2017. By examining this election, one can see how New Zealander's are able to achieve more accurate and diverse representation through their electoral system. This diversity in representation is achieved through the two votes that voters cast when they elected their representatives locally through the candidate vote and by their political party preference vote under the mixed-member proportional electoral system. New Zealand's practice of mixed-member proportional, gives their voters an advantage in the election process that voters under other electoral systems do not benefit from widely when it comes to achieving a more accurate minority representation. The primary advantage that voters achieve under the mixed-member system is that it is a hybrid system allowing voters to have majoritarian representation and proportional representation. Majoritarian representation is achieved through the candidate vote, which voters cast as they would under the electoral system First Past the Post, which awards a seat in the legislature to the candidate who receives the most votes. However, the added benefit of the mixed-member proportional system is it also provides voters with proportional representation through their party vote. Also, with the addition of the party vote, voters feel more inclined to vote for their actual preference because they know as long as their party meets the required threshold, they will receive a seat. The benefits that New Zealand voters receive under the mixed-member proportional system are presented in the outcome of their election with New Zealand's two most dominant parties, the National Party and the Labour Party receiving most of the seats with representation for minority parties. This paper demonstrates the value of mixed-member proportional for achieving desired representation.
新西兰使用混合成员比例制的检验
本文考察了新西兰最近一次大选,以确定2017年9月23日发生的第52届议会的组成。通过研究这次选举,人们可以看到新西兰人如何能够通过他们的选举制度实现更准确和多样化的代表。这种代表性的多样性是通过选民在当地选举代表时通过候选人投票和在混合成员比例选举制下通过政党偏好投票投下的两票来实现的。新西兰实行的混合比例制使选民在选举过程中具有优势,这是其他选举制度下的选民在实现更准确的少数民族代表时无法广泛受益的。选民在混合成员制下获得的主要优势是它是一种混合制度,允许选民拥有多数代表制和比例代表制。多数代表制是通过候选人投票实现的,选民按照选举制的方式投票,即将议会席位授予得票最多的候选人。然而,混合成员比例制的额外好处是,它还通过选民的政党投票为选民提供了比例代表制。另外,增加政党投票后,选民更倾向于投票给他们实际喜欢的政党,因为他们知道,只要他们的政党达到要求的门槛,他们就会获得一个席位。新西兰选民在混合比例制下获得的好处体现在他们的选举结果中,新西兰的两个最主要的政党,国家党和工党获得了大多数席位,少数党有代表。本文论证了混合成员比例对于实现理想表示的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信