Seconding health care assistants to a pre-registration nursing course: Evaluation of a novel scheme

D. Gould, G. Carr, D. Kelly, P. Brown
{"title":"Seconding health care assistants to a pre-registration nursing course: Evaluation of a novel scheme","authors":"D. Gould, G. Carr, D. Kelly, P. Brown","doi":"10.1177/136140960400900110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally in the United Kingdom, reliance has been placed on unqualified support workers, such as student nurses, to deliver a high proportion of patient care. However, the move of nurse education into higher education and the accompanying supernumerary status of student nurses in the 1980s resulted in a shortfall of staff to deliver that care. The government has made a number of suggestions for increasing recruitment. One possible solution regarded as very promising is to encourage health care assistants (HCAs) with at least 12 months' experience in the National Health Service to enrol on existing pre-registration programmes, providing them with financial incentives to do so. Very little literature directly concerned with training opportunities for HCAs could be traced, but it was evident that financial constraints and family commitments had, in the past, operated as disincentives to training, although some HCAs would otherwise be keen to register. In 1999 one of the workforce development confederations in London responded to government policy by seconding HCAs onto a pre-registration programme operated by the local university. Plans for evaluation were made at the outset. Interviews were conducted with two consecutive intakes of secondees at three time intervals: after three months; after 12 months and during the final placement of the 36-month course. Interviews with other stakeholders were conducted just before the course ended. A qualitative approach was taken and the data were analysed employing the sequence recommended by Miles and Huberman (1994). Evaluation highlighted important features of the secondment process contributing to its success and indicated pitfalls attached to introducing such schemes. It is recommended that evaluation should be extended to explore how the new staff nurses prepared by this novel scheme continue to develop their career trajectories. Given the emphasis now being placed on the 'skills escalator' model of staff development in the NHS, such approaches will assume even greater importance in future, and more extensive evaluations will be needed.","PeriodicalId":177021,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Times Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Times Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/136140960400900110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Traditionally in the United Kingdom, reliance has been placed on unqualified support workers, such as student nurses, to deliver a high proportion of patient care. However, the move of nurse education into higher education and the accompanying supernumerary status of student nurses in the 1980s resulted in a shortfall of staff to deliver that care. The government has made a number of suggestions for increasing recruitment. One possible solution regarded as very promising is to encourage health care assistants (HCAs) with at least 12 months' experience in the National Health Service to enrol on existing pre-registration programmes, providing them with financial incentives to do so. Very little literature directly concerned with training opportunities for HCAs could be traced, but it was evident that financial constraints and family commitments had, in the past, operated as disincentives to training, although some HCAs would otherwise be keen to register. In 1999 one of the workforce development confederations in London responded to government policy by seconding HCAs onto a pre-registration programme operated by the local university. Plans for evaluation were made at the outset. Interviews were conducted with two consecutive intakes of secondees at three time intervals: after three months; after 12 months and during the final placement of the 36-month course. Interviews with other stakeholders were conducted just before the course ended. A qualitative approach was taken and the data were analysed employing the sequence recommended by Miles and Huberman (1994). Evaluation highlighted important features of the secondment process contributing to its success and indicated pitfalls attached to introducing such schemes. It is recommended that evaluation should be extended to explore how the new staff nurses prepared by this novel scheme continue to develop their career trajectories. Given the emphasis now being placed on the 'skills escalator' model of staff development in the NHS, such approaches will assume even greater importance in future, and more extensive evaluations will be needed.
借调保健助理参加预注册护理课程:新方案的评价
在英国,传统上依赖于不合格的辅助工作者,如学生护士,来提供很大比例的病人护理。然而,20世纪80年代,护士教育向高等教育的转变以及随之而来的学生护士的多余地位导致了提供这种护理的人员短缺。政府提出了许多增加招聘的建议。一个被认为非常有希望的可能解决方案是,鼓励在国民医疗服务体系中至少有12个月工作经验的卫生保健助理(hca)参加现有的预注册计划,并为他们提供经济奖励。可以找到的直接涉及人道主义援助人员培训机会的文献很少,但很明显,财政限制和家庭承诺在过去阻碍了培训,尽管有些人道主义援助人员本来会热衷于注册。1999年,伦敦的一个劳动力发展联合会响应政府政策,将hca借调到当地大学运营的一个预注册项目中。一开始就制定了评价计划。面试是在三个时间间隔内对连续两次的借调人员进行的:三个月后;12个月后,36个月课程的最后阶段。与其他利益相关者的访谈在课程结束前进行。采用定性方法,采用Miles和Huberman(1994)推荐的序列对数据进行分析。评价突出了借调过程中有助于其成功的重要特点,并指出了采用这种办法的缺陷。建议应扩大评估范围,以探索通过这一新颖方案准备的新工作人员护士如何继续发展其职业轨迹。鉴于目前NHS的重点放在员工发展的“技能自动扶梯”模式上,这种方法在未来将变得更加重要,需要进行更广泛的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信