Forms of Anaphoric Reference to Organisational Named Entities: Hoping to widen appeal, they diversified

NEWS@ACL Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.18653/v1/W18-2406
Christian Hardmeier, L. Bevacqua, S. Loáiciga, H. Rohde
{"title":"Forms of Anaphoric Reference to Organisational Named Entities: Hoping to widen appeal, they diversified","authors":"Christian Hardmeier, L. Bevacqua, S. Loáiciga, H. Rohde","doi":"10.18653/v1/W18-2406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper names of organisations are a special case of collective nouns. Their meaning can be conceptualised as a collective unit or as a plurality of persons, allowing for different morphological marking of coreferent anaphoric pronouns. This paper explores the variability of references to organisation names with 1) a corpus analysis and 2) two crowd-sourced story continuation experiments. The first shows that the preference for singular vs. plural conceptualisation is dependent on the level of formality of a text. In the second, we observe a strong preference for the plural they otherwise typical of informal speech. Using edited corpus data instead of constructed sentences as stimuli reduces this preference.","PeriodicalId":189654,"journal":{"name":"NEWS@ACL","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEWS@ACL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W18-2406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Proper names of organisations are a special case of collective nouns. Their meaning can be conceptualised as a collective unit or as a plurality of persons, allowing for different morphological marking of coreferent anaphoric pronouns. This paper explores the variability of references to organisation names with 1) a corpus analysis and 2) two crowd-sourced story continuation experiments. The first shows that the preference for singular vs. plural conceptualisation is dependent on the level of formality of a text. In the second, we observe a strong preference for the plural they otherwise typical of informal speech. Using edited corpus data instead of constructed sentences as stimuli reduces this preference.
组织命名实体的回指形式:希望扩大吸引力,他们多样化了
组织的专有名称是集体名词的一种特殊情况。它们的意义可以被概念化为一个集体单位或多个人,允许对共指回指代词进行不同的形态标记。本文通过1)语料库分析和2)两个众包故事延续实验来探讨组织名称引用的可变性。第一项研究表明,对单数和复数概念的偏好取决于文本的正式程度。在第二种情况下,我们观察到人们对复数的强烈偏好,而这在非正式讲话中是典型的。使用编辑过的语料库数据而不是构建的句子作为刺激可以减少这种偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信