Effects of trx versus traditional resistance training programs on measures of muscular performance in adults

Jeffrey M. Janot, Taylor Heltne, Chelsea Welles, J. Riedl, H. Anderson, A. Howard, S. L. Myhre
{"title":"Effects of trx versus traditional resistance training programs on measures of muscular performance in adults","authors":"Jeffrey M. Janot, Taylor Heltne, Chelsea Welles, J. Riedl, H. Anderson, A. Howard, S. L. Myhre","doi":"10.1249/01.mss.0000493944.82425.a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of TRX training when compared to traditional resistance training (RT). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine responses to TRX and RT on measures of strength, core endurance, flexibility, balance, and body composition. Methods: Fifty-four younger (aged 19-25) adults and middle-aged (aged 44-64) adults were randomised into a TRX (younger n=15; older n=8) or RT (younger n=14; middle-aged n= 7) program within their respective age group. A control group was selected from additional participants (n=10) in the younger group. Prior to and after completing the 7-week training program, the participants were evaluated for: height, weight, 5RM bench press for upper body (UB) strength, 5RM back squat for lower body (LB) strength, sit-and-reach test, abdominal skinfold (aSKF), waist girth, abdominal flexor test, back extensor test, side bridge left (SBL) and right (SBR) test, and Biodex fall risk balance test. Results: Within the young adult group, there were significant (p < .05) differences pre- to posttraining in abdominal flexor, back extensor, SBL and SBR, balance, flexibility, and LB strength following training for both the TRX and traditional groups. LB strength was improved more by RT (26.5% increase vs 13.1% for TRX) and TRX showed greater relative improvements in both abdominal flexor (80.5% vs 52.9%) and back extensor (31.1% vs 9.4%) endurance compared to RT. The other measures showed similar relative improvements across time. The middle-aged adult group showed significant (p < .05) improvements pre- to posttraining in back extensor, SBL and SBR, and LB strength following training for both the TRX and RT groups. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that TRX training improves muscular fitness variables in both younger and middle-aged adults that are generally associated with RT. This could prove useful to individuals looking for more training options to gain both core endurance and muscular strength simultaneously and enhancing the diversity of exercise choices.; ;","PeriodicalId":431342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fitness Research","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fitness Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000493944.82425.a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of TRX training when compared to traditional resistance training (RT). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine responses to TRX and RT on measures of strength, core endurance, flexibility, balance, and body composition. Methods: Fifty-four younger (aged 19-25) adults and middle-aged (aged 44-64) adults were randomised into a TRX (younger n=15; older n=8) or RT (younger n=14; middle-aged n= 7) program within their respective age group. A control group was selected from additional participants (n=10) in the younger group. Prior to and after completing the 7-week training program, the participants were evaluated for: height, weight, 5RM bench press for upper body (UB) strength, 5RM back squat for lower body (LB) strength, sit-and-reach test, abdominal skinfold (aSKF), waist girth, abdominal flexor test, back extensor test, side bridge left (SBL) and right (SBR) test, and Biodex fall risk balance test. Results: Within the young adult group, there were significant (p < .05) differences pre- to posttraining in abdominal flexor, back extensor, SBL and SBR, balance, flexibility, and LB strength following training for both the TRX and traditional groups. LB strength was improved more by RT (26.5% increase vs 13.1% for TRX) and TRX showed greater relative improvements in both abdominal flexor (80.5% vs 52.9%) and back extensor (31.1% vs 9.4%) endurance compared to RT. The other measures showed similar relative improvements across time. The middle-aged adult group showed significant (p < .05) improvements pre- to posttraining in back extensor, SBL and SBR, and LB strength following training for both the TRX and RT groups. Conclusions: Overall, the findings indicate that TRX training improves muscular fitness variables in both younger and middle-aged adults that are generally associated with RT. This could prove useful to individuals looking for more training options to gain both core endurance and muscular strength simultaneously and enhancing the diversity of exercise choices.; ;
trx与传统抗阻训练项目对成人肌肉性能测量的影响
目的:很少有研究评估TRX训练与传统阻力训练(RT)的有效性。因此,本研究的目的是确定TRX和RT对力量、核心耐力、柔韧性、平衡和身体成分的影响。方法:54名年轻(19-25岁)成年人和中年(44-64岁)成年人随机分为TRX组(年轻n=15;老年n=8)或RT(年轻n=14;在他们各自的年龄组内进行中年计划。从年轻组的其他参与者(n=10)中选择对照组。在完成为期7周的训练计划之前和之后,对参与者进行评估:身高,体重,5RM上半身卧推(UB)力量,5RM下半身后蹲(LB)力量,坐伸测试,腹部皮肤折叠(aSKF),腰围,腹部屈肌测试,后伸肌测试,左侧桥(SBL)和右侧桥(SBR)测试,以及Biodex跌倒风险平衡测试。结果:在青壮年组中,TRX组和传统组在训练前后的腹屈肌、背伸肌、SBL和SBR、平衡、柔韧性和LB力量训练均有显著差异(p < 0.05)。与RT相比,RT对LB强度的改善更大(26.5% vs 13.1%), TRX对腹屈肌(80.5% vs 52.9%)和背伸肌(31.1% vs 9.4%)耐力的改善更大。其他指标也显示出类似的相对改善。中年人组在训练前后的背伸肌、SBL和SBR,以及训练后的LB力量方面,TRX组和RT组均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。结论:总体而言,研究结果表明,TRX训练改善了年轻人和中年人的肌肉健康变量,这些变量通常与rt相关。这可能对寻求更多训练选择的个人有用,以同时获得核心耐力和肌肉力量,并增强运动选择的多样性。;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信