Valentija Liholaja, Latvijas Universitāte, Diāna Hamkova
{"title":"Seksuāla rakstura darbību izpratne un kvalifikācijas problēmjautājumi","authors":"Valentija Liholaja, Latvijas Universitāte, Diāna Hamkova","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.7.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the amendments of 21 May 2009 and 15 May 2014, major changes have been in troduced in the Criminal Law provisions regarding criminal offences against sexual inviolability and morality. The amendments had a significant impact on understanding features of corpus delicti of these offences as well as on its application in practice. Although the amendments in general are viewed as positive, the analysis of court practice (case law) shows – the understanding of current provisions and, consequently, legal evaluation of the committed criminal offences is not uniform. The aim of the article is to identify the essence and causes of problematic issues with regard to qualifying the criminal offences against sexual inviolability from the point of view of criminal law provisions and theory of criminal law. atslēgvārdi: dzimumnoziegumi, izvarošana, seksuālā vardarbība, seksuāla rakstura dar bības, kvalifikācija keywords: criminal offences of sexual nature, rape, sexual violence, acts of sexual nature, qualification","PeriodicalId":212350,"journal":{"name":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the amendments of 21 May 2009 and 15 May 2014, major changes have been in troduced in the Criminal Law provisions regarding criminal offences against sexual inviolability and morality. The amendments had a significant impact on understanding features of corpus delicti of these offences as well as on its application in practice. Although the amendments in general are viewed as positive, the analysis of court practice (case law) shows – the understanding of current provisions and, consequently, legal evaluation of the committed criminal offences is not uniform. The aim of the article is to identify the essence and causes of problematic issues with regard to qualifying the criminal offences against sexual inviolability from the point of view of criminal law provisions and theory of criminal law. atslēgvārdi: dzimumnoziegumi, izvarošana, seksuālā vardarbība, seksuāla rakstura dar bības, kvalifikācija keywords: criminal offences of sexual nature, rape, sexual violence, acts of sexual nature, qualification
随着2009年5月21日和2014年5月15日的修订,《刑法》对侵犯性不可侵犯和道德的刑事犯罪的规定进行了重大修改。修正案对理解这些罪行的职权主体特征及其在实践中的适用产生了重大影响。虽然一般认为修正案是积极的,但对法院惯例(判例法)的分析表明,对现行规定的理解以及因此对所犯刑事罪行的法律评价并不统一。本文旨在从刑法规定和刑法理论的角度,辨析性不可侵犯犯罪定性问题的实质和成因。Atslēgvārdi: dzimumnoziegumi, izvarošana, seksuālā vardarb ba, seksuāla rakstura dar - b bas, kvalifikācija关键词:性犯罪,强奸,性暴力,性行为,资格