Evaluating Social Impact of Smart City Technologies and Services: Methods, Challenges, Future Directions

E. Hodson, Teija Vainio, Michel Nader Sayún, M. Tomitsch, A. Jones, Meri Jalonen, Ahmet Börütecene, M. Hasan, Irina Paraschivoiu, A. Wolff, Sharon Yavo-Ayalon, Sari Yli-Kauhaluoma, Gareth W. Young
{"title":"Evaluating Social Impact of Smart City Technologies and Services: Methods, Challenges, Future Directions","authors":"E. Hodson, Teija Vainio, Michel Nader Sayún, M. Tomitsch, A. Jones, Meri Jalonen, Ahmet Börütecene, M. Hasan, Irina Paraschivoiu, A. Wolff, Sharon Yavo-Ayalon, Sari Yli-Kauhaluoma, Gareth W. Young","doi":"10.3390/mti7030033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines motivations, definitions, methods and challenges of evaluating the social impacts of smart city technologies and services. It outlines concepts of social impact assessment and discusses how social impact has been included in smart city evaluation frameworks. Thematic analysis is used to investigate how social impact is addressed in eight smart city projects that prioritise human-centred design across a variety of contexts and development phases, from design research and prototyping to completed and speculative projects. These projects are notable for their emphasis on human, organisational and natural stakeholders; inclusion, participation and empowerment; new methods of citizen engagement; and relationships between sustainability and social impact. At the same time, there are gaps in the evaluation of social impact in both the smart city indexes and the eight projects. Based on our analysis, we contend that more coherent, consistent and analytical approaches are needed to build narratives of change and to comprehend impacts before, during and after smart city projects. We propose criteria for social impact evaluation in smart cities and identify new directions for research. This is of interest for smart city developers, researchers, funders and policymakers establishing protocols and frameworks for evaluation, particularly as smart city concepts and complex technologies evolve in the context of equitable and sustainable development.","PeriodicalId":408374,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7030033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study examines motivations, definitions, methods and challenges of evaluating the social impacts of smart city technologies and services. It outlines concepts of social impact assessment and discusses how social impact has been included in smart city evaluation frameworks. Thematic analysis is used to investigate how social impact is addressed in eight smart city projects that prioritise human-centred design across a variety of contexts and development phases, from design research and prototyping to completed and speculative projects. These projects are notable for their emphasis on human, organisational and natural stakeholders; inclusion, participation and empowerment; new methods of citizen engagement; and relationships between sustainability and social impact. At the same time, there are gaps in the evaluation of social impact in both the smart city indexes and the eight projects. Based on our analysis, we contend that more coherent, consistent and analytical approaches are needed to build narratives of change and to comprehend impacts before, during and after smart city projects. We propose criteria for social impact evaluation in smart cities and identify new directions for research. This is of interest for smart city developers, researchers, funders and policymakers establishing protocols and frameworks for evaluation, particularly as smart city concepts and complex technologies evolve in the context of equitable and sustainable development.
评估智慧城市技术和服务的社会影响:方法、挑战和未来方向
本研究考察了评估智慧城市技术和服务的社会影响的动机、定义、方法和挑战。它概述了社会影响评估的概念,并讨论了如何将社会影响纳入智慧城市评估框架。主题分析用于调查八个智慧城市项目如何解决社会影响,这些项目在各种环境和开发阶段(从设计研究和原型设计到完成和投机项目)优先考虑以人为本的设计。这些项目以强调人类、组织和自然利益相关者而闻名;包容、参与和赋权;公民参与的新方法;以及可持续性和社会影响之间的关系。同时,无论是智慧城市指标还是八大项目,对社会影响的评估都存在差距。根据我们的分析,我们认为需要更连贯、一致和分析的方法来构建变化叙事,并理解智慧城市项目之前、期间和之后的影响。我们提出了智慧城市社会影响评估的标准,并确定了新的研究方向。这是智慧城市开发商、研究人员、资助者和决策者建立评估协议和框架的兴趣,特别是在智慧城市概念和复杂技术在公平和可持续发展的背景下发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信