Understanding the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering

J. Cong, Ashok Jagannathan, Glenn D. Reinman, Y. Tamir
{"title":"Understanding the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering","authors":"J. Cong, Ashok Jagannathan, Glenn D. Reinman, Y. Tamir","doi":"10.1145/1077603.1077616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we study the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering. Through a detailed design space exploration, we show that clustering closes the energy efficiency gap between SMT and CMP at equal performance points. Specifically, we show that the energy efficiency of CMP compared to SMT at a given performance decreases from a maximum of 25% in a monolithic processor case to 6% when the processor resources are clustered. By carefully considering floorplans, we show that this is, in part, enabled by the small energy consumption (less than 3%) of the interconnection buses required for clustering, even with SMT. As the gap narrows, we show that the efficiency of SMT versus CMP depends on the contribution of leakage energy: at lower leakage, the CMP tends to be better than the SMT, while the SMT outperforms the CMP at higher leakage levels. We demonstrate these results over a wide range of performance and machine configurations.","PeriodicalId":256018,"journal":{"name":"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.","volume":"400 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISLPED '05. Proceedings of the 2005 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1077603.1077616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper we study the energy efficiency of SMT and CMP with multiclustering. Through a detailed design space exploration, we show that clustering closes the energy efficiency gap between SMT and CMP at equal performance points. Specifically, we show that the energy efficiency of CMP compared to SMT at a given performance decreases from a maximum of 25% in a monolithic processor case to 6% when the processor resources are clustered. By carefully considering floorplans, we show that this is, in part, enabled by the small energy consumption (less than 3%) of the interconnection buses required for clustering, even with SMT. As the gap narrows, we show that the efficiency of SMT versus CMP depends on the contribution of leakage energy: at lower leakage, the CMP tends to be better than the SMT, while the SMT outperforms the CMP at higher leakage levels. We demonstrate these results over a wide range of performance and machine configurations.
了解SMT和CMP的多聚类能效
本文研究了SMT和CMP的多聚类能效问题。通过详细的设计空间探索,我们发现聚类在相同的性能点上缩小了SMT和CMP之间的能效差距。具体来说,我们表明,在给定性能下,CMP与SMT相比的能源效率从单片处理器情况下的最高25%下降到处理器资源集群时的6%。通过仔细考虑平面图,我们发现这在一定程度上是由群集所需的互连总线的小能耗(小于3%)实现的,即使使用SMT也是如此。随着间隙的缩小,我们发现SMT与CMP的效率取决于泄漏能量的贡献:在低泄漏水平下,CMP往往优于SMT,而SMT在高泄漏水平下优于CMP。我们在各种性能和机器配置中演示了这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信