South Carolina Sampling, Analysis, and Governance of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances

Justin Kidd, Emily Fabricatore, D. Jackson
{"title":"South Carolina Sampling, Analysis, and Governance of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances","authors":"Justin Kidd, Emily Fabricatore, D. Jackson","doi":"10.34068/jscwr/08.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extent of sampling, analytical, and governance guidelines for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in individual states is currently inconsistent. There are no federally mandated regulations on PFAS, and the geochemical variations within different states can lead to regionally specific PFAS contamination, resulting in state-specific guidelines for PFAS contamination in different environmental matrices. There are no facilities in South Carolina known to currently or previously produce PFAS; however, they may be used in the production of other goods at industries throughout South Carolina, including Class B firefighting foams, consumer items, packaging, and stain- and weather-resistant fabrics. We assessed the sampling, analytical, and governance strategies of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) to understand current state-specific guidelines for PFAS contamination in South Carolina. This assessment indicates that SCDHEC has conducted sampling and analysis of community drinking water systems supplied by surface water for PFAS contamination. Additionally, risk indicators have been made for highly susceptible areas for likely PFAS contamination, including Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Energy (DOE) sites, airports, and landfills in South Carolina. Recently, bills have been introduced into the South Carolina legislature to address PFAS. These proactive approaches in South Carolina aid in the assessment of the risks of PFAS contamination and are important steps for SCDHEC and South Carolina legislative stakeholders as they continue to develop and enforce state-specific standards for PFAS chemicals and await more information and official regulatory drivers from the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).","PeriodicalId":412787,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South Carolina Water Resources","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South Carolina Water Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34068/jscwr/08.01.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The extent of sampling, analytical, and governance guidelines for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in individual states is currently inconsistent. There are no federally mandated regulations on PFAS, and the geochemical variations within different states can lead to regionally specific PFAS contamination, resulting in state-specific guidelines for PFAS contamination in different environmental matrices. There are no facilities in South Carolina known to currently or previously produce PFAS; however, they may be used in the production of other goods at industries throughout South Carolina, including Class B firefighting foams, consumer items, packaging, and stain- and weather-resistant fabrics. We assessed the sampling, analytical, and governance strategies of the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SCDHEC) to understand current state-specific guidelines for PFAS contamination in South Carolina. This assessment indicates that SCDHEC has conducted sampling and analysis of community drinking water systems supplied by surface water for PFAS contamination. Additionally, risk indicators have been made for highly susceptible areas for likely PFAS contamination, including Department of Defense (DOD) and Department of Energy (DOE) sites, airports, and landfills in South Carolina. Recently, bills have been introduced into the South Carolina legislature to address PFAS. These proactive approaches in South Carolina aid in the assessment of the risks of PFAS contamination and are important steps for SCDHEC and South Carolina legislative stakeholders as they continue to develop and enforce state-specific standards for PFAS chemicals and await more information and official regulatory drivers from the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
南卡罗来纳州全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的取样、分析和治理
目前,各国对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质的取样、分析和治理准则的范围并不一致。目前还没有针对PFAS的联邦强制性法规,而不同州的地球化学变化可能导致PFAS污染的区域特异性,因此需要针对不同环境基质下的PFAS污染制定针对不同州的指导方针。南卡罗来纳州目前或以前没有生产PFAS的设施;然而,它们可用于南卡罗莱纳工业的其他产品生产,包括B级消防泡沫、消费品、包装以及耐污和耐候织物。我们评估了南卡罗来纳州卫生和环境控制部门(SCDHEC)的采样、分析和治理策略,以了解南卡罗来纳州目前针对PFAS污染的具体州指导方针。该评估表明,SCDHEC对地表水供应的社区饮用水系统进行了PFAS污染采样和分析。此外,已经为可能受PFAS污染的高度敏感区域制定了风险指标,包括国防部(DOD)和能源部(DOE)的站点,机场和南卡罗来纳州的垃圾填埋场。最近,南卡罗来纳州立法机构提出了解决PFAS问题的法案。南卡罗来纳州的这些积极措施有助于评估PFAS污染的风险,对于SCDHEC和南卡罗来纳州的立法利益相关者来说,这是重要的一步,因为他们将继续制定和执行PFAS化学品的州特定标准,并等待美国环境保护署(US EPA)提供更多信息和官方监管驱动程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信