Comparison of antenna diversity schemes

B. Gavilanes-Loureiro, I. De Coster, E. V. Van Lil, F. Pérez-Fontán
{"title":"Comparison of antenna diversity schemes","authors":"B. Gavilanes-Loureiro, I. De Coster, E. V. Van Lil, F. Pérez-Fontán","doi":"10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares 4 kinds of simple diversity schemes for an indoor scenario at 2.4 GHz: polarisation, dual antenna, antenna and polarisation, and triple antenna for an indoor scenario, all combined according to 5 different techniques. Useful parameters are extracted statistically. We conclude that the power combining method gives the best results, and that the extra complexity of the 3 antenna case is not always justified from a cost viewpoint.","PeriodicalId":226788,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)","volume":"80 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares 4 kinds of simple diversity schemes for an indoor scenario at 2.4 GHz: polarisation, dual antenna, antenna and polarisation, and triple antenna for an indoor scenario, all combined according to 5 different techniques. Useful parameters are extracted statistically. We conclude that the power combining method gives the best results, and that the extra complexity of the 3 antenna case is not always justified from a cost viewpoint.
天线分集方案的比较
本文比较了2.4 GHz室内场景下的4种简单分集方案:极化分集、双天线分集、天线和极化分集以及室内场景下的三天线分集,并根据5种不同的技术组合在一起。统计提取有用的参数。我们得出结论,功率组合方法给出了最好的结果,并且从成本的角度来看,3天线情况的额外复杂性并不总是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信