Symposium on Education and Politics in a Global Age “A Different Kind of Politics”

H. Boyte
{"title":"Symposium on Education and Politics in a Global Age “A Different Kind of Politics”","authors":"H. Boyte","doi":"10.7571/esjkyoiku.14.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the age of what Gert Biesta calls subjecti fi cation, “the uniqueness of each individual human being,” the promise of citizens-as-subjects is to break with the ideal of the “good citizen” whose identity is inscribed by state and market. Making such a break involves “exposure to the experiment of democra-cy,” in Biesta’s view. This essay argues that the promise is real but the danger is that subjecti fi cation becomes “identity politics” which erode the responsibility of citizens for society as a whole and generate bitter clashes as identities are manipulated by elites using social media and other technologies. “What is democracy?” is the question that marks the difference between subjects as co-creators and subjugation. To overcome the dangers and realize the possibilities of the age of the subject requires shifting paradigms from state-centered democracy to citizen-centered democracy. Citizen-centered democracy rests on conceptions of citizens as co-creators who undertake the collective, self-organ-ized work of building society (which is a concept of the citizen which predates the modern state); and politics as pluralist, negotiation across differences. State-centered theories of democracy and associated ideas of the citizen and politics form the dominant paradigm today. Despite problems in Japanese political education such as passive instructional pedagogies, this essay argues that there are powerful resources in Japan’s civic life and cultural history to push back against the dominant view and lay foundations for a paradigm of democracy as society. There is also current evidence of a shift from civic attachment to insular communities, bonding social capital, to what many theorists call “bridging social capital,” which I argue is better described as pluralist citizen politics. The essay describes the experiment in democratic pedagogies and con-ceptual innovation of a new paradigm at Tokai University. It calls for international collaboration on this paradigm of citizen-centered democracy.","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.14.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the age of what Gert Biesta calls subjecti fi cation, “the uniqueness of each individual human being,” the promise of citizens-as-subjects is to break with the ideal of the “good citizen” whose identity is inscribed by state and market. Making such a break involves “exposure to the experiment of democra-cy,” in Biesta’s view. This essay argues that the promise is real but the danger is that subjecti fi cation becomes “identity politics” which erode the responsibility of citizens for society as a whole and generate bitter clashes as identities are manipulated by elites using social media and other technologies. “What is democracy?” is the question that marks the difference between subjects as co-creators and subjugation. To overcome the dangers and realize the possibilities of the age of the subject requires shifting paradigms from state-centered democracy to citizen-centered democracy. Citizen-centered democracy rests on conceptions of citizens as co-creators who undertake the collective, self-organ-ized work of building society (which is a concept of the citizen which predates the modern state); and politics as pluralist, negotiation across differences. State-centered theories of democracy and associated ideas of the citizen and politics form the dominant paradigm today. Despite problems in Japanese political education such as passive instructional pedagogies, this essay argues that there are powerful resources in Japan’s civic life and cultural history to push back against the dominant view and lay foundations for a paradigm of democracy as society. There is also current evidence of a shift from civic attachment to insular communities, bonding social capital, to what many theorists call “bridging social capital,” which I argue is better described as pluralist citizen politics. The essay describes the experiment in democratic pedagogies and con-ceptual innovation of a new paradigm at Tokai University. It calls for international collaboration on this paradigm of citizen-centered democracy.
全球化时代的教育与政治研讨会“另一种政治”
在格特·比斯塔(Gert Biesta)所说的主体化时代,即“每个个体的独特性”,公民作为主体的承诺将打破“好公民”的理想,而“好公民”的身份是由国家和市场铭刻的。在Biesta看来,做出这样的突破需要“暴露在民主的实验中”。本文认为,承诺是真实的,但危险在于,主体性成为“身份政治”,侵蚀公民对整个社会的责任,并产生激烈的冲突,因为身份被精英利用社交媒体和其他技术操纵。“什么是民主?这个问题标志着主体作为共同创造者和被奴役者之间的区别。要克服这些危险,实现主体时代的可能性,就需要从以国家为中心的民主主义转变为以市民为中心的民主主义。以公民为中心的民主建立在这样的观念之上:公民是共同创造者,承担集体的、自组织的建设社会的工作(这是一个早于现代国家的公民概念);政治是多元的,是跨越分歧的谈判。以国家为中心的民主理论以及与之相关的公民和政治思想构成了今天的主导范式。尽管日本政治教育存在消极教学法等问题,但本文认为,日本的公民生活和文化史中存在强大的资源,可以推翻主流观点,为民主社会范式奠定基础。目前也有证据表明,从公民依恋到孤立的社区,结合社会资本,再到许多理论家所说的“桥接社会资本”,我认为这应该被更好地描述为多元公民政治。本文介绍东海大学民主教学法的实验和新范式的概念创新。它要求就这种以公民为中心的民主模式进行国际合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信