The Importance of Families of Minors in the Rehabilitation Work of Educators – an Interactive Perspective

G. Dobińska, Katarzyna Anna Miśkiewicz
{"title":"The Importance of Families of Minors in the Rehabilitation Work of Educators – an Interactive Perspective","authors":"G. Dobińska, Katarzyna Anna Miśkiewicz","doi":"10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.177-194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The paper focuses on the work of pedagogues (educators of youth educational centers and family probation officers), who work with families of minors. Research Aim: The aim of the article is to describe the types of social rehabilitation educators and the significance that pedagogues attribute to their relations with the families of minors as part of strengthening social rehabilitation activities. Method: The collected empirical material comes from interviews and observations of the everyday professional lives of educators from educational centers and family probation officers. The procedures of grounded methodology determined the method of analyzing the collected data, creating conditions for the generation of patterns which shaped the activities performed by the educators. The theoretical framework is determined by the assumptions of symbolic interactionism. Results: We will present a typology of educators and strategies used by them in contacts with families of minors in an open and closed environment. We have highlighted the extreme strategies applied by educators in their work with families of juveniles, i.e. active and passive strategies, and within this framework we selected the tactics used by the respondents. Conclusions: We managed to find out that despite the variety of environments in which educators of youth educational centers and family probation officers work, they reached for similar activities aimed at establishing and managing a relationship with the families of minors. Furthermore, we compared our analyses with the proposed characteristics of models of working with families. Finally, we took note of the fact that while the respondents implemented all work models, the professional-directed and family-allied models dominated.","PeriodicalId":258263,"journal":{"name":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","volume":"23 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2023.42.1.177-194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The paper focuses on the work of pedagogues (educators of youth educational centers and family probation officers), who work with families of minors. Research Aim: The aim of the article is to describe the types of social rehabilitation educators and the significance that pedagogues attribute to their relations with the families of minors as part of strengthening social rehabilitation activities. Method: The collected empirical material comes from interviews and observations of the everyday professional lives of educators from educational centers and family probation officers. The procedures of grounded methodology determined the method of analyzing the collected data, creating conditions for the generation of patterns which shaped the activities performed by the educators. The theoretical framework is determined by the assumptions of symbolic interactionism. Results: We will present a typology of educators and strategies used by them in contacts with families of minors in an open and closed environment. We have highlighted the extreme strategies applied by educators in their work with families of juveniles, i.e. active and passive strategies, and within this framework we selected the tactics used by the respondents. Conclusions: We managed to find out that despite the variety of environments in which educators of youth educational centers and family probation officers work, they reached for similar activities aimed at establishing and managing a relationship with the families of minors. Furthermore, we compared our analyses with the proposed characteristics of models of working with families. Finally, we took note of the fact that while the respondents implemented all work models, the professional-directed and family-allied models dominated.
未成年人家庭在教育工作者康复工作中的重要性——互动视角
导言:本文的重点是教育工作者(青少年教育中心的教育工作者和家庭缓刑官员)的工作,他们与未成年人的家庭一起工作。研究目的:本文的目的是描述社会康复教育者的类型,以及教育者认为他们与未成年人家庭的关系作为加强社会康复活动的一部分的意义。方法:收集的实证资料来自于对教育中心教育工作者和家庭缓刑官的日常职业生活的访谈和观察。扎根方法论的程序决定了分析收集到的数据的方法,为形成模式创造了条件,这些模式塑造了教育者所进行的活动。理论框架是由符号互动主义的假设所决定的。结果:我们将提出教育工作者的类型和策略使用他们接触未成年人的家庭在一个开放和封闭的环境。我们强调了教育工作者在青少年家庭工作中应用的极端策略,即主动和被动策略,在这个框架内,我们选择了受访者使用的策略。结论:我们设法发现,尽管青少年教育中心的教育工作者和家庭缓刑官员工作的环境多种多样,但他们达成了类似的活动,旨在建立和管理与未成年人家庭的关系。此外,我们将我们的分析与提出的与家庭合作的模型的特征进行了比较。最后,我们注意到这样一个事实,即虽然受访者实施了所有的工作模式,但以专业为导向和家庭相关的模式占主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信