Supporting platooning maneuvers through IVC: An initial protocol analysis for the JOIN maneuver

Michele Segata, Bastian Bloessl, Stefan Joerer, F. Dressler, R. Cigno
{"title":"Supporting platooning maneuvers through IVC: An initial protocol analysis for the JOIN maneuver","authors":"Michele Segata, Bastian Bloessl, Stefan Joerer, F. Dressler, R. Cigno","doi":"10.1109/WONS.2014.6814733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Driving vehicles in platoons has the potential to improve traffic efficiency, increase safety, reduce fuel consumption, and make driving experience more enjoyable. A lot of effort is being spent in the development of technologies, like radars, enabling automated cruise control following and ensuring emergency braking if the driver does not react in time; but these technologies alone do not empower real platooning. The initial idea of building dedicated infrastructures for platoons, has been set aside favouring the philosophy that foresees scenarios, where automated vehicles share the road with human-driven ones. This arises interesting new questions regarding the interactions between the two categories of vehicles. In this paper we focus on the analysis of interferences caused by non-automated vehicles during a JOIN maneuver. We define the application layer protocol to support the maneuver, together with situations that can prevent successful termination, and describe how they can be detected. The validity of the approach is proven by means of simulations, showing either that the maneuver can successfully be performed, or safely be aborted. Finally, we analyze the impact of the Packet Error Rate (PER) on the failure rate of the maneuver, showing that packet losses mainly affect the maneuver from a coordination point of view, rather than stability of the system, i.e., even at high loss rates, cars never violated a minimum safety distance.","PeriodicalId":386988,"journal":{"name":"2014 11th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS)","volume":"284 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"69","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 11th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WONS.2014.6814733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 69

Abstract

Driving vehicles in platoons has the potential to improve traffic efficiency, increase safety, reduce fuel consumption, and make driving experience more enjoyable. A lot of effort is being spent in the development of technologies, like radars, enabling automated cruise control following and ensuring emergency braking if the driver does not react in time; but these technologies alone do not empower real platooning. The initial idea of building dedicated infrastructures for platoons, has been set aside favouring the philosophy that foresees scenarios, where automated vehicles share the road with human-driven ones. This arises interesting new questions regarding the interactions between the two categories of vehicles. In this paper we focus on the analysis of interferences caused by non-automated vehicles during a JOIN maneuver. We define the application layer protocol to support the maneuver, together with situations that can prevent successful termination, and describe how they can be detected. The validity of the approach is proven by means of simulations, showing either that the maneuver can successfully be performed, or safely be aborted. Finally, we analyze the impact of the Packet Error Rate (PER) on the failure rate of the maneuver, showing that packet losses mainly affect the maneuver from a coordination point of view, rather than stability of the system, i.e., even at high loss rates, cars never violated a minimum safety distance.
通过IVC支持队列机动:对JOIN机动的初始协议分析
车队驾驶有可能提高交通效率、提高安全性、降低燃油消耗,并使驾驶体验更加愉快。在雷达等技术的开发上投入了大量精力,这些技术可以实现自动巡航控制,并确保在驾驶员没有及时反应的情况下紧急刹车;但这些技术本身并不能实现真正的队列驾驶。为车队建造专用基础设施的最初想法已被搁置一边,转而支持一种预见场景的理念,即自动驾驶车辆与人类驾驶的车辆共享道路。这就产生了关于两类车辆之间相互作用的有趣的新问题。本文重点分析了联合机动中非自动车辆的干扰。我们定义了支持机动的应用层协议,以及可能阻止成功终止的情况,并描述了如何检测它们。通过仿真验证了该方法的有效性,表明该机动可以成功进行,也可以安全中止。最后,我们分析了包错误率(Packet Error Rate, PER)对机动失败率的影响,表明丢包主要是从协调的角度影响机动,而不是系统的稳定性,即即使在高丢包率的情况下,车辆也不会违反最小安全距离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信