Covering Uncommon Ground: Gap-Focused Question Generation for Answer Assessment

Ron Rabin, Alexandre Djerbetian, Roee Engelberg, Lidan Hackmon, G. Elidan, Reut Tsarfaty, A. Globerson
{"title":"Covering Uncommon Ground: Gap-Focused Question Generation for Answer Assessment","authors":"Ron Rabin, Alexandre Djerbetian, Roee Engelberg, Lidan Hackmon, G. Elidan, Reut Tsarfaty, A. Globerson","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.03319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human communication often involves information gaps between the interlocutors. For example, in an educational dialogue a student often provides an answer that is incomplete, and there is a gap between this answer and the perfect one expected by the teacher. Successful dialogue then hinges on the teacher asking about this gap in an effective manner, thus creating a rich and interactive educational experience. We focus on the problem of generating such gap-focused questions (GFQs) automatically. We define the task, highlight key desired aspects of a good GFQ, and propose a model that satisfies these. Finally, we provide an evaluation by human annotators of our generated questions compared against human generated ones, demonstrating competitive performance.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.03319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human communication often involves information gaps between the interlocutors. For example, in an educational dialogue a student often provides an answer that is incomplete, and there is a gap between this answer and the perfect one expected by the teacher. Successful dialogue then hinges on the teacher asking about this gap in an effective manner, thus creating a rich and interactive educational experience. We focus on the problem of generating such gap-focused questions (GFQs) automatically. We define the task, highlight key desired aspects of a good GFQ, and propose a model that satisfies these. Finally, we provide an evaluation by human annotators of our generated questions compared against human generated ones, demonstrating competitive performance.
涵盖不寻常的领域:针对答案评估的空白问题生成
人类的交流经常涉及对话者之间的信息空白。例如,在教育对话中,学生经常提供一个不完整的答案,并且这个答案与老师期望的完美答案之间存在差距。成功的对话取决于教师以有效的方式询问这一差距,从而创造丰富的互动教育体验。我们专注于自动生成这种缺口聚焦问题(GFQs)的问题。我们定义了任务,强调了一个好的GFQ所需的关键方面,并提出了一个满足这些的模型。最后,我们提供了由人类注释者对我们生成的问题与人类生成的问题进行比较的评估,展示了竞争性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信