Studying misbehavior in CSMA/CA Wireless LANs

N. Hatami
{"title":"Studying misbehavior in CSMA/CA Wireless LANs","authors":"N. Hatami","doi":"10.1145/1454630.1454652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security is a fundamental aspect for achieving high availability and reliability in wireless networks. Wireless medium access control (MAC) protocols use distributed contention resolution mechanisms for sharing the wireless medium. Wireless nodes decide access to their channel independently and accessing the channel by a node has an influence on those of other nodes. In this environment, selfish nodes that do not obey the operation of the MAC protocol may obtain an unfair share of the channel bandwidth at the expense of well-behaved nodes.\n Game theory is a useful and powerful tool to research this kind of systems. We study the effect of misbehavior in CSMA/CA wireless LANs and in particular in Idle Sense access method which has been designed to optimize the performance and fairness of the network using game theory. We show that Nash equilibrium point of our game is not an optimal point of the game. Then we find the Pareto-optimal point of our game using static game model from Nash bargaining framework. We design a prevention model to force nodes converge to the Pareto-optimal point and make the Pareto-optimal point as the Nash equilibrium point of our game. Finally, we devise a detection system to detect deviating cheaters from optimal point.","PeriodicalId":311005,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Performance Monitoring, Measurement, and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Wireless and Wired Networks","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Performance Monitoring, Measurement, and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Wireless and Wired Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1454630.1454652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Security is a fundamental aspect for achieving high availability and reliability in wireless networks. Wireless medium access control (MAC) protocols use distributed contention resolution mechanisms for sharing the wireless medium. Wireless nodes decide access to their channel independently and accessing the channel by a node has an influence on those of other nodes. In this environment, selfish nodes that do not obey the operation of the MAC protocol may obtain an unfair share of the channel bandwidth at the expense of well-behaved nodes. Game theory is a useful and powerful tool to research this kind of systems. We study the effect of misbehavior in CSMA/CA wireless LANs and in particular in Idle Sense access method which has been designed to optimize the performance and fairness of the network using game theory. We show that Nash equilibrium point of our game is not an optimal point of the game. Then we find the Pareto-optimal point of our game using static game model from Nash bargaining framework. We design a prevention model to force nodes converge to the Pareto-optimal point and make the Pareto-optimal point as the Nash equilibrium point of our game. Finally, we devise a detection system to detect deviating cheaters from optimal point.
CSMA/CA无线局域网中的不当行为研究
安全性是实现无线网络高可用性和可靠性的基本方面。无线媒体访问控制(MAC)协议使用分布式争用解决机制来共享无线媒体。无线节点独立决定对其信道的访问,一个节点访问该信道会对其他节点的访问产生影响。在这种环境下,不遵守MAC协议操作的自私节点可能会以牺牲行为良好的节点为代价获得不公平的信道带宽份额。博弈论是研究这类系统的有力工具。我们研究了在CSMA/CA无线局域网中不当行为的影响,特别是利用博弈论优化网络性能和公平性的空闲感知接入方法。我们证明了博弈的纳什均衡点并不是博弈的最优点。然后利用纳什议价框架中的静态博弈模型,找到了该博弈的帕累托最优点。我们设计了一个预防模型,迫使节点收敛于帕累托最优点,并将帕累托最优点作为博弈的纳什均衡点。最后,我们设计了一个从最优点检测偏离作弊者的检测系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信