Seeking Traces of Filters and Amplifiers as Pre-service Teachers Perform Their Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Mehmet Şen, B. Demirdöğen
{"title":"Seeking Traces of Filters and Amplifiers as Pre-service Teachers Perform Their Pedagogical Content Knowledge","authors":"Mehmet Şen, B. Demirdöğen","doi":"10.33828/sei.v34.i1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined how filters and amplifiers affect pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in a human and environment unit. The redefined consensus model for PCK and decision-making framework for identifying how personal and extra-personal factors act as filters and amplifiers were selected as theoretical frameworks. Two pre-service science teachers participated in the study. While pre-interviews were used to determine participants’ PCK before teaching, observations and post-interviews were used to reveal participants’ PCK after teaching, and how filters and amplifiers influenced PCK. Data were analyzed deductively to examine teachers’ PCK including interactions among components and the way filters and amplifiers act on PCK. Constant comparison analysis revealed five general assertions of how filters and amplifiers shaped the decision-making process when these teachers enacted their PCK. First, the number of amplifiers and filters affecting knowledge of instructional strategies was the highest. Second, the number of amplifiers and filters affecting knowledge of curriculum in science was the lowest. Third, the effect of filters and amplifiers on PCK components was idiosyncratic. Fourth, the more (or the less) the map was integrated; the less (or the more) amplifier and filter influenced the PCK. Fifth, the number of personal factors affecting knowledge of instructional strategies was highest. Implications are suggested considering the effects of filters and amplifiers on teachers’ PCK.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v34.i1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined how filters and amplifiers affect pre-service science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in a human and environment unit. The redefined consensus model for PCK and decision-making framework for identifying how personal and extra-personal factors act as filters and amplifiers were selected as theoretical frameworks. Two pre-service science teachers participated in the study. While pre-interviews were used to determine participants’ PCK before teaching, observations and post-interviews were used to reveal participants’ PCK after teaching, and how filters and amplifiers influenced PCK. Data were analyzed deductively to examine teachers’ PCK including interactions among components and the way filters and amplifiers act on PCK. Constant comparison analysis revealed five general assertions of how filters and amplifiers shaped the decision-making process when these teachers enacted their PCK. First, the number of amplifiers and filters affecting knowledge of instructional strategies was the highest. Second, the number of amplifiers and filters affecting knowledge of curriculum in science was the lowest. Third, the effect of filters and amplifiers on PCK components was idiosyncratic. Fourth, the more (or the less) the map was integrated; the less (or the more) amplifier and filter influenced the PCK. Fifth, the number of personal factors affecting knowledge of instructional strategies was highest. Implications are suggested considering the effects of filters and amplifiers on teachers’ PCK.
在职前教师执行其教学内容知识时寻找过滤器和放大器的痕迹
本研究考察了过滤器和放大器如何影响职前科学教师的教学内容知识(PCK)。重新定义的PCK共识模型和决策框架,以确定个人和非个人因素如何作为过滤器和放大器被选择作为理论框架。两名职前科学教师参与了这项研究。教学前的访谈被用来确定被试的PCK,而观察和后访谈被用来揭示教学后被试的PCK,以及滤波器和放大器如何影响PCK。对数据进行演绎分析,以检验教师的PCK,包括各成分之间的相互作用以及滤波器和放大器对PCK的作用方式。不断的比较分析揭示了过滤器和放大器如何在这些教师制定PCK时塑造决策过程的五个一般断言。首先,影响教学策略知识的放大器和过滤器的数量是最高的。其次,影响科学课程知识的“放大器”和“过滤器”的数量最少。第三,滤波器和放大器对PCK成分的影响是特殊的。第四,地图的整合程度越高(或越低);放大器和滤波器对PCK的影响越小(或越大)。第五,影响教学策略知识的个人因素数量最多。考虑滤波器和放大器对教师PCK的影响,提出了一些启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信