Subjective Assessment of the Effective Contract Impact in Universities on Improving the Indicators of Lectures` Research Work

P. Derkachev, Z. Varakina, N. S. Guseva, N. S. Klishevich
{"title":"Subjective Assessment of the Effective Contract Impact in Universities on Improving the Indicators of Lectures` Research Work","authors":"P. Derkachev, Z. Varakina, N. S. Guseva, N. S. Klishevich","doi":"10.15826/umpa.2022.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Article shows the results of a sociological survey aimed at studying the opinion of the teaching staff on the impact of an effective contract on improving the research work indicators in universities in Russia and Belarus. The survey analyzes foreign and Russian evaluation of academic staff performance. A cross-sectional (single-point) study was the design. The focus of research was the academic staff of educational institutions that went over to an effective contract (Northern State Medical University, Russia) and without the implementation of an effective contract (Tobolsk Pedagogical Institute named after D. I. Mendeleev (branch) the University of Tyumen, Russia; National Institute for Higher Education and Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank, Belarus), the overall number of respondents is 395. A semi-structured questionnaire created by the National Research University Higher School of Economics was used as a tool for sociological research. The study showed that both study groups are aware of an effective contract purpose and criteria evaluation frequency. Respondents from universities without an effective contract receive information from the Internet and have overestimated expectations of the future income level. Respondents of both groups underlined the importance of determining the greatest weight in calculating incentive payments for publication and grant activity, participation in scientific conferences. When implementing an effective contract, not all lecturers are ready to fulfill the criteria for research work, but they note the positive effect of its implementation on the indicators of scientific activity. In the group of respondents without an effective contract, one third expressed doubts about the significant impact of the implementation of an effective contract on improving the performance of research work. This article will be useful to the management of universities when calculating weighting coefficients according to indicators and criteria for evaluating the activities of the teaching staff for the appointment of incentive payments. An interesting study in the future may be a comparison of subjective assessments obtained in universities without an effective contract, and after its implementation in the same universities.","PeriodicalId":310472,"journal":{"name":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University Management: Practice and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2022.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Article shows the results of a sociological survey aimed at studying the opinion of the teaching staff on the impact of an effective contract on improving the research work indicators in universities in Russia and Belarus. The survey analyzes foreign and Russian evaluation of academic staff performance. A cross-sectional (single-point) study was the design. The focus of research was the academic staff of educational institutions that went over to an effective contract (Northern State Medical University, Russia) and without the implementation of an effective contract (Tobolsk Pedagogical Institute named after D. I. Mendeleev (branch) the University of Tyumen, Russia; National Institute for Higher Education and Belarusian State Pedagogical University named after Maxim Tank, Belarus), the overall number of respondents is 395. A semi-structured questionnaire created by the National Research University Higher School of Economics was used as a tool for sociological research. The study showed that both study groups are aware of an effective contract purpose and criteria evaluation frequency. Respondents from universities without an effective contract receive information from the Internet and have overestimated expectations of the future income level. Respondents of both groups underlined the importance of determining the greatest weight in calculating incentive payments for publication and grant activity, participation in scientific conferences. When implementing an effective contract, not all lecturers are ready to fulfill the criteria for research work, but they note the positive effect of its implementation on the indicators of scientific activity. In the group of respondents without an effective contract, one third expressed doubts about the significant impact of the implementation of an effective contract on improving the performance of research work. This article will be useful to the management of universities when calculating weighting coefficients according to indicators and criteria for evaluating the activities of the teaching staff for the appointment of incentive payments. An interesting study in the future may be a comparison of subjective assessments obtained in universities without an effective contract, and after its implementation in the same universities.
高校有效合同对提高讲师科研工作指标影响的主观评价
本文展示了一项社会学调查的结果,该调查旨在研究俄罗斯和白俄罗斯大学教师对有效合同对提高研究工作指标的影响的看法。该调查分析了外国和俄罗斯对学术人员绩效的评价。设计为横断面(单点)研究。研究的重点是接受有效合同的教育机构的学术人员(俄罗斯北方国立医科大学)和没有执行有效合同的教育机构的学术人员(以门捷列夫命名的托博尔斯克教育学院(分支),秋明大学,俄罗斯;白俄罗斯国立高等教育学院和白俄罗斯国立师范大学(以白俄罗斯马克西姆坦克命名),受访者总数为395人。由国立研究型大学高等经济学院制作的半结构化问卷被用作社会学研究的工具。研究表明,两个研究组都意识到有效的合同目的和标准评价频率。没有签订有效合同的大学生从互联网上获取信息,对未来收入水平的期望值过高。这两组的答复者都强调了在计算出版和资助活动、参加科学会议的奖励金时确定最大权重的重要性。在实施有效的合同时,并非所有的讲师都准备好履行研究工作的标准,但他们注意到实施合同对科学活动指标的积极影响。在没有有效合同的答复组中,三分之一的人对实施有效合同对提高研究工作绩效的重大影响表示怀疑。本文将为高校管理部门根据评价教职员工活动的指标和标准计算权重系数,确定激励薪酬提供参考。未来一个有趣的研究可能是比较在没有有效合同的大学中获得的主观评价,以及在同一所大学实施后的主观评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信