Using broadcast primitives in replicated databases

I. Stanoi, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi
{"title":"Using broadcast primitives in replicated databases","authors":"I. Stanoi, D. Agrawal, A. E. Abbadi","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.1998.679497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore the use of different variants of broadcast protocols for managing replicated databases. Starting with the simplest broadcast primitive, the reliable broadcast protocol, we show how it can be used to ensure correct transaction execution. The protocol is simple, and has several advantages, including prevention of deadlocks. However, it requires a two-phase commitment protocol for ensuring correctness. We then develop a second protocol that uses causal broadcast and avoids the overhead of two-phase commit by exploiting the causal delivery properties of the broadcast primitives to implicitly collect the relevant information used in two-phase commit. Finally, we present a protocol that employs atomic broadcast and completely eliminates the need for acknowledgements during transaction commitment.","PeriodicalId":289230,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.1998.679497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

We explore the use of different variants of broadcast protocols for managing replicated databases. Starting with the simplest broadcast primitive, the reliable broadcast protocol, we show how it can be used to ensure correct transaction execution. The protocol is simple, and has several advantages, including prevention of deadlocks. However, it requires a two-phase commitment protocol for ensuring correctness. We then develop a second protocol that uses causal broadcast and avoids the overhead of two-phase commit by exploiting the causal delivery properties of the broadcast primitives to implicitly collect the relevant information used in two-phase commit. Finally, we present a protocol that employs atomic broadcast and completely eliminates the need for acknowledgements during transaction commitment.
在复制数据库中使用广播原语
我们探讨了使用不同变体的广播协议来管理复制数据库。从最简单的广播原语(可靠的广播协议)开始,我们将展示如何使用它来确保正确的事务执行。该协议很简单,并且有几个优点,包括防止死锁。然而,它需要一个两阶段的提交协议来确保正确性。然后,我们开发了第二个协议,该协议使用因果广播,并通过利用广播原语的因果传递属性来隐式收集两阶段提交中使用的相关信息,从而避免了两阶段提交的开销。最后,我们提出了一种采用原子广播的协议,完全消除了在事务提交期间确认的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信