Genomics and human diversity

B. Jordan
{"title":"Genomics and human diversity","authors":"B. Jordan","doi":"10.4000/urmis.2397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sequencing of the human genome (2003) has been followed by a number of technical developments that allow detailed characterization (including complete sequencing) of the DNA of thousands of individuals. This has provided an estimate of human genetic diversity: approx. 3 million base substitutions within our genome that includes 3,000 million bases. Although the divergence between any two individuals is small, it is responsible for much of the phenotypic diversity observed within the human population, and current techniques make it possible to measure genetic distances between any two individuals whose genome has been analysed. When results from a large sample of persons are analysed by sophisticated multi-dimensional representation, fairly distinct clusters appear in the population, indicating groups of individuals that are more similar to each other than to persons from other groups. Although these groups are defined by genome analysis, without any a priori information on their origin, it turns out that they largely correspond to so-called “ethnic” categories that reflect genetic ancestry (e.g. Europeans, Africans and Asians). Every group is internally quite diverse, but analysis of thousands of genetic markers does indeed differentiate between them. “Race”, as commonly defined, is a very imperfect proxy for these ancestry groups, as it suggests high homogeneity within each group, implies assumptions about behaviour and “character” that have no scientific basis, and is heavily tainted by past uses in support of oppression and even genocide. Thus “ancestry” or “ancestry group” is a highly preferable term, especially now that more and more people are of mixed ancestry. These methods have been widely applied to current populations and to “ancient DNA” from historical samples, and have made possible great strides in understanding the history of our species.","PeriodicalId":119696,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers de l’Urmis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers de l’Urmis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/urmis.2397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sequencing of the human genome (2003) has been followed by a number of technical developments that allow detailed characterization (including complete sequencing) of the DNA of thousands of individuals. This has provided an estimate of human genetic diversity: approx. 3 million base substitutions within our genome that includes 3,000 million bases. Although the divergence between any two individuals is small, it is responsible for much of the phenotypic diversity observed within the human population, and current techniques make it possible to measure genetic distances between any two individuals whose genome has been analysed. When results from a large sample of persons are analysed by sophisticated multi-dimensional representation, fairly distinct clusters appear in the population, indicating groups of individuals that are more similar to each other than to persons from other groups. Although these groups are defined by genome analysis, without any a priori information on their origin, it turns out that they largely correspond to so-called “ethnic” categories that reflect genetic ancestry (e.g. Europeans, Africans and Asians). Every group is internally quite diverse, but analysis of thousands of genetic markers does indeed differentiate between them. “Race”, as commonly defined, is a very imperfect proxy for these ancestry groups, as it suggests high homogeneity within each group, implies assumptions about behaviour and “character” that have no scientific basis, and is heavily tainted by past uses in support of oppression and even genocide. Thus “ancestry” or “ancestry group” is a highly preferable term, especially now that more and more people are of mixed ancestry. These methods have been widely applied to current populations and to “ancient DNA” from historical samples, and have made possible great strides in understanding the history of our species.
基因组学与人类多样性
人类基因组测序(2003年)之后,一系列技术发展使得对数千个人的DNA进行详细表征(包括完整测序)成为可能。这提供了一个人类遗传多样性的估计值:大约。在我们的基因组中有300万个碱基替换,其中包括30亿个碱基。尽管任何两个个体之间的差异很小,但它是人类群体中观察到的表型多样性的主要原因,而且目前的技术使测量任何两个基因组已被分析的个体之间的遗传距离成为可能。当大量人群样本的结果通过复杂的多维表示进行分析时,在人群中出现了相当不同的集群,这表明个体群体彼此之间的相似性比其他群体的人更大。虽然这些群体是通过基因组分析来定义的,没有任何关于他们起源的先验信息,但事实证明,他们在很大程度上对应于反映遗传祖先的所谓“种族”类别(例如欧洲人、非洲人和亚洲人)。每个群体在内部都是相当多样化的,但对数千个遗传标记的分析确实可以区分它们。“种族”,一般的定义,是这些祖先群体的一个非常不完美的代表,因为它暗示了每个群体内部的高度同质性,暗示了对行为和“性格”的假设,这些假设没有科学依据,并且由于过去用于支持压迫甚至种族灭绝而受到严重污染。因此,“祖先”或“祖先群体”是一个非常可取的术语,特别是现在越来越多的人具有混合血统。这些方法已经被广泛应用于现在的种群和来自历史样本的“古代DNA”,并在了解我们物种的历史方面取得了巨大的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信