The effects of syntactic and acoustic cues on the perception of prosodic boundaries

Jianjing Kuang, May Pik Yu Chan, Nari Rhee
{"title":"The effects of syntactic and acoustic cues on the perception of prosodic boundaries","authors":"Jianjing Kuang, May Pik Yu Chan, Nari Rhee","doi":"10.21437/speechprosody.2022-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates how the perception of prosodic boundaries is shaped by syntactic phrasing and acoustic cues for English and Mandarin listeners. Syntactically-parsed speech corpora were used as the stimuli for the perception experiment. The relative strength of the syntactic boundary of both the left and right sides of the constituents was extracted from the syntactic parsing annotations. A wide range of acoustic cues of both prosodic domain-final and domain-initial positions were examined. Linear-mixed-effects modeling of the likelihood of boundary perception suggests that, for both languages, prosodic boundary perception was influenced by both the strength of syntactic boundary and acoustic cues: boundary perception was heavily driven by the presence of pause; pause also modulated the contribution of other acoustic cues; and larger syntactic boundaries were generally more likely to be perceived as prosodic boundaries. However, there is also cross-linguistic variation: the effect of syntactic phrasing cues was generally stronger for English; acoustically, the effect of final lengthening and pitch reset was stronger in English, while pause was the dominant cue in Mandarin. We discuss the important implica-tions of these findings related to the nature of prosodic hierar-chy, and the nature of the prosody-syntax interface.","PeriodicalId":442842,"journal":{"name":"Speech Prosody 2022","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Speech Prosody 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21437/speechprosody.2022-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study investigates how the perception of prosodic boundaries is shaped by syntactic phrasing and acoustic cues for English and Mandarin listeners. Syntactically-parsed speech corpora were used as the stimuli for the perception experiment. The relative strength of the syntactic boundary of both the left and right sides of the constituents was extracted from the syntactic parsing annotations. A wide range of acoustic cues of both prosodic domain-final and domain-initial positions were examined. Linear-mixed-effects modeling of the likelihood of boundary perception suggests that, for both languages, prosodic boundary perception was influenced by both the strength of syntactic boundary and acoustic cues: boundary perception was heavily driven by the presence of pause; pause also modulated the contribution of other acoustic cues; and larger syntactic boundaries were generally more likely to be perceived as prosodic boundaries. However, there is also cross-linguistic variation: the effect of syntactic phrasing cues was generally stronger for English; acoustically, the effect of final lengthening and pitch reset was stronger in English, while pause was the dominant cue in Mandarin. We discuss the important implica-tions of these findings related to the nature of prosodic hierar-chy, and the nature of the prosody-syntax interface.
句法和听觉线索对韵律边界感知的影响
本研究探讨了英语和普通话听者对韵律边界的感知是如何由句法短语和声音线索形成的。感知实验以句法分析后的语料库为刺激。从句法解析标注中提取成分左右两侧语法边界的相对强度。研究了韵律域末位和域初位的广泛声学线索。边界感知可能性的线性混合效应模型表明,对于两种语言,韵律边界感知都受到句法边界和声学线索的强度的影响:边界感知在很大程度上受到停顿的存在的驱动;停顿也调节了其他声音线索的作用;较大的句法边界通常更容易被理解为韵律边界。然而,也存在跨语言差异:语法短语线索的影响通常对英语更强;在声学上,英语的最后延长和音调重置效果更强,而普通话的暂停是主要的线索。我们讨论了这些发现的重要意义,这些发现涉及韵律层次的性质,以及韵律语法界面的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信