Improving Crowdsourcing Efficiency Based on Division Strategy

Huan Jiang, S. Matsubara
{"title":"Improving Crowdsourcing Efficiency Based on Division Strategy","authors":"Huan Jiang, S. Matsubara","doi":"10.1109/WI-IAT.2012.86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the efficiency in crowd sourcing, especially crowd sourcing for the software bug detection. Crowd sourcing has recently emerged as a lucrative paradigm for leveraging the collective intelligence of crowds. However, it has inherent weakness that a simple reward setting causes an uneven distribution of workers on each task, which reduces the efficiency of solving the tasks. A challenge is that the system designer is not allowed to set the reward to the arbitrary value because so-called \"market wages\" exist and if the reward is set to the value lower than the market wage, such a task fails to attract the sufficient number of workers. To solve this problem, we focus on the division strategy that divides the crowds into different groups and the workers compete with each other among the same group. We have developed a model that crowds write their codes independently and then try to find bugs in the codes written by the others. Next, we examine two division strategy, random grouping and ability grouping by analyzing the equilibrium behavior of each worker and carrying out simulations. The results show that the division strategy affect the efficiency of crowd sourcing bug detection and the random grouping leads to a higher efficiency compared to the ability grouping.","PeriodicalId":220218,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WI-IAT.2012.86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper examines the efficiency in crowd sourcing, especially crowd sourcing for the software bug detection. Crowd sourcing has recently emerged as a lucrative paradigm for leveraging the collective intelligence of crowds. However, it has inherent weakness that a simple reward setting causes an uneven distribution of workers on each task, which reduces the efficiency of solving the tasks. A challenge is that the system designer is not allowed to set the reward to the arbitrary value because so-called "market wages" exist and if the reward is set to the value lower than the market wage, such a task fails to attract the sufficient number of workers. To solve this problem, we focus on the division strategy that divides the crowds into different groups and the workers compete with each other among the same group. We have developed a model that crowds write their codes independently and then try to find bugs in the codes written by the others. Next, we examine two division strategy, random grouping and ability grouping by analyzing the equilibrium behavior of each worker and carrying out simulations. The results show that the division strategy affect the efficiency of crowd sourcing bug detection and the random grouping leads to a higher efficiency compared to the ability grouping.
基于事业部战略的众包效率提升
本文考察了众包的效率,特别是软件bug检测方面的众包。众包最近成为了一种利用群体集体智慧的有利可图的范例。然而,简单的奖励设置会导致每个任务的工人分配不均,从而降低了解决任务的效率,这是它固有的弱点。一个挑战是,系统设计者不允许将奖励设定为任意值,因为所谓的“市场工资”存在,如果奖励设定为低于市场工资的值,这样的任务就无法吸引足够数量的工人。为了解决这一问题,我们关注的是将人群划分为不同的群体,工人在同一群体中相互竞争的划分策略。我们已经开发了一种模型,即人们独立编写代码,然后尝试在其他人编写的代码中找到错误。其次,通过分析每个工人的均衡行为并进行仿真,研究了随机分组和能力分组两种分工策略。结果表明,分组策略影响众包漏洞检测的效率,随机分组比能力分组的效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信