Evaluation and comparison of RFI detection algorithms

J. Lahtinen, J. Uusitalo, Teemu Ruokokoski, J. Ruoskanen
{"title":"Evaluation and comparison of RFI detection algorithms","authors":"J. Lahtinen, J. Uusitalo, Teemu Ruokokoski, J. Ruoskanen","doi":"10.1109/MICRORAD.2016.7530505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anthropogenic Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) is an increasing problem in microwave remote sensing radiometry. Therefore, there is a growing interest on methods to detect and filter RFI. In this study, the performance of several different detection algorithms has been studied and compared to detect Continuous Wave (CW), QPSK modulated, and pulse modulated (with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% duty cycles) RFI. The mission scenario corresponds a spaceborne, polar-orbiting, conically scanning microwave radiometer. However, the qualitative results (e.g., the relative performances of algorithms) are applicable to other scenarios as well. It has been shown that RFI detection thresholds in 1 K range can be achieved in this scenario if complementary RFI detection algorithms can be incorporated in the system, e.g., in a digital RFI processor. Even 0.1 K level can be achieved for pulsed RFI with low duty cycles. Kurtosis and spectral kurtosis are effective in detecting pulsed RFI but not optimal in detecting constant envelope signals (such as CW or QPSK). Spectral Density Estimation and polarimetry, on the other hand, have a performance that is independent on the modulation or duty cycle of the RFI - they are sensitive to the average power.","PeriodicalId":330696,"journal":{"name":"2016 14th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 14th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment (MicroRad)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICRORAD.2016.7530505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Anthropogenic Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) is an increasing problem in microwave remote sensing radiometry. Therefore, there is a growing interest on methods to detect and filter RFI. In this study, the performance of several different detection algorithms has been studied and compared to detect Continuous Wave (CW), QPSK modulated, and pulse modulated (with 0.1%, 1%, and 10% duty cycles) RFI. The mission scenario corresponds a spaceborne, polar-orbiting, conically scanning microwave radiometer. However, the qualitative results (e.g., the relative performances of algorithms) are applicable to other scenarios as well. It has been shown that RFI detection thresholds in 1 K range can be achieved in this scenario if complementary RFI detection algorithms can be incorporated in the system, e.g., in a digital RFI processor. Even 0.1 K level can be achieved for pulsed RFI with low duty cycles. Kurtosis and spectral kurtosis are effective in detecting pulsed RFI but not optimal in detecting constant envelope signals (such as CW or QPSK). Spectral Density Estimation and polarimetry, on the other hand, have a performance that is independent on the modulation or duty cycle of the RFI - they are sensitive to the average power.
RFI检测算法的评价与比较
人为射频干扰(RFI)是微波遥感辐射测量中日益突出的问题。因此,人们对检测和过滤RFI的方法越来越感兴趣。在本研究中,研究了几种不同检测算法的性能,并对检测连续波(CW)、QPSK调制和脉冲调制(0.1%、1%和10%占空比)RFI进行了比较。该任务方案对应于星载、极轨、锥形扫描微波辐射计。然而,定性结果(例如,算法的相对性能)也适用于其他场景。已经证明,在这种情况下,如果可以在系统中(例如,在数字RFI处理器中)合并互补的RFI检测算法,则可以实现1k范围内的RFI检测阈值。低占空比的脉冲RFI甚至可以达到0.1 K电平。峰度和谱峰度在检测脉冲RFI时是有效的,但在检测恒定包络信号(如CW或QPSK)时不是最佳的。另一方面,谱密度估计和偏振测量的性能与RFI的调制或占空比无关——它们对平均功率很敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信