DIVISION OF TRANSACTION INTO OBLIGATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ONES: PROSPECTS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSOLIDATION

E. Ostapova
{"title":"DIVISION OF TRANSACTION INTO OBLIGATORY AND ADMINISTRATIVE ONES: PROSPECTS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSOLIDATION","authors":"E. Ostapova","doi":"10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-4-272-279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a legal assessment of the prospects for legislative consolidation in Russia of the division of transactions into obligatory and administrative, the opinion about the need for which is expressed in the science of civil law. Supporters of the idea of ​​administrative transactions as such consider the actions of the parties to execute the contract. Meanwhile, the position of scientists who reject the idea of ​​administrative transactions seems to be more consistent with the civil legislation of Russia, since the current civil legislation does not give grounds to consider the actions of the parties to the agreement on its execution as transactions. Otherwise, the transaction will be deprived of its main feature — the free expression of the will of the parties, since the fulfillment of obligations does not imply such an expression of will. In support of his position, the author made an attempt to refute the arguments that the assignment of rights presupposes the expression of the will of the parties to conclude an agreement and a separate expression of their will to make the assignment, that is, the execution of an administrative transaction in pursuance of the specified agreement.","PeriodicalId":275116,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","volume":"201 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Juridical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29039/2413-1733-2021-7-4-272-279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides a legal assessment of the prospects for legislative consolidation in Russia of the division of transactions into obligatory and administrative, the opinion about the need for which is expressed in the science of civil law. Supporters of the idea of ​​administrative transactions as such consider the actions of the parties to execute the contract. Meanwhile, the position of scientists who reject the idea of ​​administrative transactions seems to be more consistent with the civil legislation of Russia, since the current civil legislation does not give grounds to consider the actions of the parties to the agreement on its execution as transactions. Otherwise, the transaction will be deprived of its main feature — the free expression of the will of the parties, since the fulfillment of obligations does not imply such an expression of will. In support of his position, the author made an attempt to refute the arguments that the assignment of rights presupposes the expression of the will of the parties to conclude an agreement and a separate expression of their will to make the assignment, that is, the execution of an administrative transaction in pursuance of the specified agreement.
交易分为强制性交易和行政性交易:立法巩固的前景
本文对俄罗斯将交易划分为强制性交易和行政性交易的立法巩固前景进行了法律评估,并从民法科学的角度阐述了其必要性。行政交易概念的支持者考虑了当事人执行合同的行为。同时,反对行政交易的科学家的立场似乎与俄罗斯民事立法更加一致,因为目前的民事立法没有理由将协议执行各方的行为视为交易。否则,交易将失去其主要特征- -当事人自由表达意志,因为履行义务并不意味着这种意愿的表达。为了支持他的立场,发件人试图驳斥下述论点,即权利转让的先决条件是当事人表示愿意缔结一项协议,并单独表示愿意进行转让,即按照具体的协议执行一项行政事务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信