Reproduction and Gender Self-Determination: Fertile Grounds for Trans Legal Advocacy

Samira Seraji
{"title":"Reproduction and Gender Self-Determination: Fertile Grounds for Trans Legal Advocacy","authors":"Samira Seraji","doi":"10.36641/mjgl.28.2.reproduction","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current medical constructions of trans identities reflect heterosexist understandings of gender expression—understandings that deny access to gender-affirming healthcare to those who fail to perform normative binary genders. As medical providers establish norms for how to “properly” be trans, the state codifies these norms, basing trans existence on rigidly defined and harshly enforced understandings of binary gender. When this construction of transness is codified on an institutional level, such as with gender reclassification rules for government identification, it forces trans people to conform their bodies to cisgender norms, and dangerously disrupts trans people’s bodily autonomy and diminishes their control over their reproductive choices.\n\nThis Article contends that the gender conformity that the state requires of trans people parallels the violence that the state has inflicted on low-income non-trans women of color. As welfare policies have sought to constrain indigent Black women’s reproductive and sexual autonomy, courts use legal gender determination to force trans people to conform to heterosexist sexual and family structures—a project that works to constrain their reproductive freedoms. This Article connects the decades-long struggle of non-trans women of color for reproductive justice with that of trans people’s right to self-identify without medical intervention. In doing so, this Article calls for legal trans advocates to coalition build with existing reproductive justice movements to nurture a trans jurisprudence that rejects heterosexist notions of trans identity and instead embraces the multiplicity of trans embodiment and queer family structures that we, as trans people, can create.","PeriodicalId":303089,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Journal of Gender & Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.28.2.reproduction","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current medical constructions of trans identities reflect heterosexist understandings of gender expression—understandings that deny access to gender-affirming healthcare to those who fail to perform normative binary genders. As medical providers establish norms for how to “properly” be trans, the state codifies these norms, basing trans existence on rigidly defined and harshly enforced understandings of binary gender. When this construction of transness is codified on an institutional level, such as with gender reclassification rules for government identification, it forces trans people to conform their bodies to cisgender norms, and dangerously disrupts trans people’s bodily autonomy and diminishes their control over their reproductive choices. This Article contends that the gender conformity that the state requires of trans people parallels the violence that the state has inflicted on low-income non-trans women of color. As welfare policies have sought to constrain indigent Black women’s reproductive and sexual autonomy, courts use legal gender determination to force trans people to conform to heterosexist sexual and family structures—a project that works to constrain their reproductive freedoms. This Article connects the decades-long struggle of non-trans women of color for reproductive justice with that of trans people’s right to self-identify without medical intervention. In doing so, this Article calls for legal trans advocates to coalition build with existing reproductive justice movements to nurture a trans jurisprudence that rejects heterosexist notions of trans identity and instead embraces the multiplicity of trans embodiment and queer family structures that we, as trans people, can create.
生殖和性别自决:跨法律倡导的沃土
目前跨性别认同的医学建构反映了异性恋者对性别表达的理解,这种理解拒绝那些没有表现出规范的二元性别的人获得性别肯定的医疗保健。当医疗机构为如何“正确地”成为跨性别者建立规范时,国家将这些规范编入法律,将跨性别者的存在建立在对二元性别的严格定义和严格执行的理解之上。当跨性别的这种建构在制度层面上被编纂,比如政府身份的性别重新分类规则,它迫使跨性别者的身体符合顺性别规范,并危险地破坏了跨性别者的身体自主权,削弱了他们对生殖选择的控制。本文认为,国家对跨性别者的性别一致性要求与国家对有色人种的低收入非跨性别女性施加的暴力是一致的。由于福利政策试图限制贫困黑人妇女的生殖和性自主权,法院利用法律上的性别决定来强迫跨性别者遵守异性恋者的性和家庭结构——这是一个限制他们生殖自由的项目。本文将有色人种非跨性别女性为生殖正义而进行的长达数十年的斗争与跨性别者在没有医疗干预的情况下自我认同的权利联系起来。为此,本文呼吁跨性别法律倡导者与现有的生殖正义运动联合起来,培育一种跨性别法理,拒绝异性恋者对跨性别身份的看法,而是接受我们作为跨性别者可以创造的跨性别体现和酷儿家庭结构的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信