Analysis of Mathematics National Exam Questions based on TIMSS Taxonomy

Nur Colis
{"title":"Analysis of Mathematics National Exam Questions based on TIMSS Taxonomy","authors":"Nur Colis","doi":"10.18326/HIPOTENUSA.V3I1.25-51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to find out the spread out content and cognitive dimension of the question of Mathematics National Exam for Junior High School (SMP) / Islamic Junior High School (MTs) in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 and find out the suitability question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School based on government guidelines and TIMSS taxonomy. This type of research is a qualitative approach. This research use collection data with document analysis. Data analysis techniques consist of data reduction, data display, and verification. The research subjects were in the form of 14 SMP / MTs national mathematics exam texts from the 2005/2006 to 2018/2019 academic year. The indicators of content dimensions and cognitive dimensions used are based on the TIMSS taxonomy. Checking the validity of the data, the researcher uses a triangulation by an expert through Online FGD (Focus Group Discussion).The research result as follows: 1. An analysis a question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 based on a taxonomy TIMSS obtain results that percentage spread of content and cognitive dimension still not appropriate yet with TIMSS Assessment Framework. At the content dimension, the spread of a question dominated by geometry domain while data and probability have spread of a question very few. Then, algebra and number domain pretty close proportion which have been specified by TIMSS. 2. the question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School to the scope of material which set by the government was not given percentage distribution of materials obviously while cognitive level from government obtains a result that different with findings result in the researcher based on TIMSS taxonomy because there is different definition at government cognitive level from with TIMSS cognitive domain. There is a question that includes an application in government cognitive level however it includes knowing domain based on TIMSS taxonomy. Suitability a question of Final Exam from the school year of 2005/2006 till 2018/2019 indicate there are percentages increase from year to year close appropriate to proportion TIMSS Assessment Framework. It shows the percentage each other domain close proportion TIMSS in content and cognitive dimension.","PeriodicalId":134360,"journal":{"name":"Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18326/HIPOTENUSA.V3I1.25-51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out the spread out content and cognitive dimension of the question of Mathematics National Exam for Junior High School (SMP) / Islamic Junior High School (MTs) in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 and find out the suitability question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School based on government guidelines and TIMSS taxonomy. This type of research is a qualitative approach. This research use collection data with document analysis. Data analysis techniques consist of data reduction, data display, and verification. The research subjects were in the form of 14 SMP / MTs national mathematics exam texts from the 2005/2006 to 2018/2019 academic year. The indicators of content dimensions and cognitive dimensions used are based on the TIMSS taxonomy. Checking the validity of the data, the researcher uses a triangulation by an expert through Online FGD (Focus Group Discussion).The research result as follows: 1. An analysis a question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School in the school year of 2005/2006-2018/2019 based on a taxonomy TIMSS obtain results that percentage spread of content and cognitive dimension still not appropriate yet with TIMSS Assessment Framework. At the content dimension, the spread of a question dominated by geometry domain while data and probability have spread of a question very few. Then, algebra and number domain pretty close proportion which have been specified by TIMSS. 2. the question of Mathematics Final Exam in Junior High School to the scope of material which set by the government was not given percentage distribution of materials obviously while cognitive level from government obtains a result that different with findings result in the researcher based on TIMSS taxonomy because there is different definition at government cognitive level from with TIMSS cognitive domain. There is a question that includes an application in government cognitive level however it includes knowing domain based on TIMSS taxonomy. Suitability a question of Final Exam from the school year of 2005/2006 till 2018/2019 indicate there are percentages increase from year to year close appropriate to proportion TIMSS Assessment Framework. It shows the percentage each other domain close proportion TIMSS in content and cognitive dimension.
基于TIMSS分类的数学国考试题分析
本研究的目的是了解2005/2006-2018/2019学年初中数学国家考试/伊斯兰初中数学期末考试(SMP)问题的发散内容和认知维度,并根据政府指南和TIMSS分类找出初中数学期末考试的适宜性问题。这种类型的研究是一种定性方法。本研究采用收集数据和文献分析的方法。数据分析技术包括数据简化、数据显示和验证。研究对象为2005/2006学年至2018/2019学年的14份SMP / MTs国家数学考试文本。所使用的内容维度和认知维度指标基于TIMSS分类法。为了检查数据的有效性,研究者使用了专家通过在线FGD(焦点小组讨论)进行的三角测量。研究结果如下:1。基于TIMSS分类对2005/2006-2018/2019学年初中数学期末考试试题进行分析,发现TIMSS评估框架中内容的百分比分布和认知维度仍不合适。在内容维度上,问题的传播以几何域为主,而数据和概率的传播很少。结果表明,代数域与数域的关系与TIMSS所规定的关系相当接近。2. 初中数学期末考试题目对政府设定的材料范围没有给出明显的材料百分比分布,而政府认知层面得到的结果与基于TIMSS分类法的研究者得到的结果不同,因为政府认知层面与TIMSS认知领域的定义不同。在政府认知层面有一个应用的问题,但是它包含了基于TIMSS分类法的认知域。从2005/2006学年到2018/2019学年期末考试的适用性问题表明,每年的百分比都在增加,接近TIMSS评估框架的比例。它显示了TIMSS在内容和认知维度上彼此领域接近比例的百分比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信