The Researcher as Storyteller

B. Hagedoorn, S. Sauer
{"title":"The Researcher as Storyteller","authors":"B. Hagedoorn, S. Sauer","doi":"10.18146/2213-0969.2018.JETHC159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article offers a first exploratory critique of digital tools' socio-technical affordances in terms of support for narrative creation by media researchers. More specifically, we reflect on narrative creation processes of research, writing and story composition by Media Studies and Humanities scholars, as well as media professionals, working with crossmedia and audio-visual sources, and the pivotal ways in which digital tools inform these processes of search and storytelling. Our study proposes to add to the existing body of user-centred Digital Humanities research by presenting the insights of a cross-disciplinary user study. This involves, broadly speaking, researchers studying audio-visual materials in a co-creative design process, set to fine-tune and further develop a digital tool (technically based on linked open data) that supports audio-visual research through exploratory search. This article focuses on how 89 researchers – in both academic and professional research settings – use digital search technologies in their daily work practices to discover and explore (crossmedia, digital) audio-visual archival sources, especially when studying mediated and historical events. We focus on three user types, (1) Media Studies researchers; (2) Humanities researchers that use digitized audio-visual materials as a source for research, and (3) media professionals who need to retrieve materials for audio-visual text productions, including journalists, television/image researchers, documentalists, documentary filmmakers, digital storytellers, and media innovation experts. Our study primarily provides insights into the search, retrieval and narrative creation practices of these user groups. A user study such as this which combines different qualitative methods (focus groups with co-creative design sessions, research diaries, questionnaires), first, affords fine-grained insights. Second, it demonstrates the relevance of closely considering practices and mechanisms conditioning narrative creation, including self-reflexive approaches. Third and finally, it informs conclusions about the role of digital tools in meaning-creation processes when working with audio-visual sources, and where interaction is pivotal.","PeriodicalId":269127,"journal":{"name":"Audiovisual Data in Digital Humanities","volume":"520 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiovisual Data in Digital Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18146/2213-0969.2018.JETHC159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article offers a first exploratory critique of digital tools' socio-technical affordances in terms of support for narrative creation by media researchers. More specifically, we reflect on narrative creation processes of research, writing and story composition by Media Studies and Humanities scholars, as well as media professionals, working with crossmedia and audio-visual sources, and the pivotal ways in which digital tools inform these processes of search and storytelling. Our study proposes to add to the existing body of user-centred Digital Humanities research by presenting the insights of a cross-disciplinary user study. This involves, broadly speaking, researchers studying audio-visual materials in a co-creative design process, set to fine-tune and further develop a digital tool (technically based on linked open data) that supports audio-visual research through exploratory search. This article focuses on how 89 researchers – in both academic and professional research settings – use digital search technologies in their daily work practices to discover and explore (crossmedia, digital) audio-visual archival sources, especially when studying mediated and historical events. We focus on three user types, (1) Media Studies researchers; (2) Humanities researchers that use digitized audio-visual materials as a source for research, and (3) media professionals who need to retrieve materials for audio-visual text productions, including journalists, television/image researchers, documentalists, documentary filmmakers, digital storytellers, and media innovation experts. Our study primarily provides insights into the search, retrieval and narrative creation practices of these user groups. A user study such as this which combines different qualitative methods (focus groups with co-creative design sessions, research diaries, questionnaires), first, affords fine-grained insights. Second, it demonstrates the relevance of closely considering practices and mechanisms conditioning narrative creation, including self-reflexive approaches. Third and finally, it informs conclusions about the role of digital tools in meaning-creation processes when working with audio-visual sources, and where interaction is pivotal.
作为故事讲述者的研究者
本文首次对数字工具的社会技术支持进行了探索性批判,即媒体研究人员对叙事创作的支持。更具体地说,我们反思了媒体研究和人文学者以及媒体专业人士使用跨媒体和视听资源进行研究、写作和故事创作的叙事创作过程,以及数字工具为这些搜索和讲故事过程提供信息的关键方式。我们的研究建议通过提出跨学科用户研究的见解来增加现有的以用户为中心的数字人文学科研究。从广义上讲,这包括研究人员在共同创造的设计过程中研究视听材料,设置微调和进一步开发数字工具(技术上基于链接的开放数据),通过探索性搜索支持视听研究。本文重点介绍了89名研究人员在学术和专业研究环境中如何在日常工作中使用数字搜索技术来发现和探索(跨媒体,数字)视听档案资源,特别是在研究中介和历史事件时。我们关注三种用户类型,(1)媒体研究研究者;(2)使用数字化视听材料作为研究来源的人文学科研究人员;(3)需要检索材料进行视听文本制作的媒体专业人员,包括记者、电视/图像研究人员、文献工作者、纪录片制片人、数字故事讲述者和媒体创新专家。我们的研究主要提供了对这些用户群体的搜索、检索和叙事创作实践的见解。像这样的用户研究结合了不同的定性方法(焦点小组与共同创意设计会议,研究日记,问卷调查),首先,提供了细粒度的见解。其次,它展示了密切考虑实践和机制的相关性,包括自我反思的方法。第三,也是最后,它提供了关于数字工具在使用视听资源和交互至关重要的意义创造过程中的作用的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信