Do Voluntary Environmental Programs Reduce Emissions? EMAS in the German Manufacturing Sector

R. Kube, Kathrine von Graevenitz, A. Löschel, Philipp Massier
{"title":"Do Voluntary Environmental Programs Reduce Emissions? EMAS in the German Manufacturing Sector","authors":"R. Kube, Kathrine von Graevenitz, A. Löschel, Philipp Massier","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3337589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voluntary environmental management programs for firms have become an increasingly popular instrument of environmental policy. However, the literature's conclusion on the effectiveness of such programs is ambiguous, and for the European region there is a lack of evidence based on a large control group. We seek to fill this gap with an evaluation of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), introduced in 1995 by the European Union as a premium certification of continuous pro-environmental efforts above regulatory minimum standards. It is more demanding than other voluntary programs due to annual public reports of the environmental performance and targets for improvements. We use official firm-level production census data on the German manufacturing sector, a major energy consumer and emitter in Europe. To account for the self-selection of firms, we combine the Coarsened Exact Matching approach with a Difference-in-Differences estimation. Our results do not suggest reductions of firms' CO2 intensity and energy intensity neither before nor after certification. Moreover, program participants do not increase renewable energy consumption or investments into the protection of the environment and climate. Our results are robust to a variety of checks and call into question the effectiveness of the EMAS program concerning these particular outcome variables.","PeriodicalId":188091,"journal":{"name":"Systems Ecology eJournal","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Ecology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3337589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Voluntary environmental management programs for firms have become an increasingly popular instrument of environmental policy. However, the literature's conclusion on the effectiveness of such programs is ambiguous, and for the European region there is a lack of evidence based on a large control group. We seek to fill this gap with an evaluation of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), introduced in 1995 by the European Union as a premium certification of continuous pro-environmental efforts above regulatory minimum standards. It is more demanding than other voluntary programs due to annual public reports of the environmental performance and targets for improvements. We use official firm-level production census data on the German manufacturing sector, a major energy consumer and emitter in Europe. To account for the self-selection of firms, we combine the Coarsened Exact Matching approach with a Difference-in-Differences estimation. Our results do not suggest reductions of firms' CO2 intensity and energy intensity neither before nor after certification. Moreover, program participants do not increase renewable energy consumption or investments into the protection of the environment and climate. Our results are robust to a variety of checks and call into question the effectiveness of the EMAS program concerning these particular outcome variables.
自愿环保计划能减少排放吗?德国制造业的EMAS
企业自愿环境管理计划已成为越来越受欢迎的环境政策工具。然而,文献对此类计划有效性的结论是模糊的,对于欧洲地区,缺乏基于大型对照组的证据。我们试图通过对生态管理和审计计划(EMAS)的评估来填补这一空白,该计划于1995年由欧洲联盟推出,作为持续环保努力高于监管最低标准的优质认证。由于环境绩效和改善目标的年度公开报告,它比其他自愿项目要求更高。我们使用德国制造业的官方企业生产普查数据,德国制造业是欧洲主要的能源消耗和排放国。为了解释企业的自我选择,我们将粗化精确匹配方法与差中差估计相结合。我们的研究结果表明,无论是在认证之前还是之后,企业的二氧化碳强度和能源强度都没有降低。此外,项目参与者没有增加可再生能源的消耗或对环境和气候保护的投资。我们的结果对各种检查都是稳健的,并对EMAS计划关于这些特定结果变量的有效性提出了质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信