The Relationship Between Levels of Care and Physical Functioning in Community-Dwelling Elderly Women

Norito kobayashi, Seiya Shishido, H. Toji, Yasushi Miura
{"title":"The Relationship Between Levels of Care and Physical Functioning in Community-Dwelling Elderly Women","authors":"Norito kobayashi, Seiya Shishido, H. Toji, Yasushi Miura","doi":"10.9759/hppt.10.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": We compared physical and cognitive function, daily life activity, and the char-acteristics among community-dwelling elderly women. Participants were categorized into Independent (20 women considered independent), Support (19 women needing category 1 and 2 support), and Nursing care (21 women needing category 1 and 2 nursing care) groups.We evaluated grip strength, 10-s chair stand test (CS-10), timed up-and-go test (TUG), functional reach test, 5-m maximum walking time (5 MWT), center-of-gravity sway test, Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index. CS-10 was significantly higher in the Independent group than the Support and the Nursing care groups. TUG was significantly higher in the Independent group than the Nursing care group. Center-of-gravity sway test was significantly higher in the Independent and the Support groups, respectively, than the Nursing care group. The Independent group showed significantly higher physical functions than the Support and Nursing care groups. There were no significant differences in physical functions between the Support group and Nursing care group, therefore static balance functions are the attribution for the levels of care.","PeriodicalId":225008,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9759/hppt.10.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: We compared physical and cognitive function, daily life activity, and the char-acteristics among community-dwelling elderly women. Participants were categorized into Independent (20 women considered independent), Support (19 women needing category 1 and 2 support), and Nursing care (21 women needing category 1 and 2 nursing care) groups.We evaluated grip strength, 10-s chair stand test (CS-10), timed up-and-go test (TUG), functional reach test, 5-m maximum walking time (5 MWT), center-of-gravity sway test, Mini-Mental State Examination, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index. CS-10 was significantly higher in the Independent group than the Support and the Nursing care groups. TUG was significantly higher in the Independent group than the Nursing care group. Center-of-gravity sway test was significantly higher in the Independent and the Support groups, respectively, than the Nursing care group. The Independent group showed significantly higher physical functions than the Support and Nursing care groups. There were no significant differences in physical functions between the Support group and Nursing care group, therefore static balance functions are the attribution for the levels of care.
社区居住老年妇女护理水平与身体功能的关系
我们比较了社区老年妇女的身体和认知功能、日常生活活动和特征。参与者被分为独立组(20名女性被认为独立)、支持组(19名女性需要1类和2类支持)和护理组(21名女性需要1类和2类护理)。我们评估了握力、10-s椅子站立测试(CS-10)、计时起走测试(TUG)、功能到达测试、5米最大步行时间(5 MWT)、重心摇摆测试、迷你精神状态检查和东京都老年学研究所指数。独立组的CS-10明显高于支持组和护理组。独立组的TUG显著高于护理组。独立组和支持组的重心摇摆测试分别显著高于护理组。独立组的身体机能明显高于支持组和护理组。支持组和护理组在身体功能上没有显著差异,因此静态平衡功能是护理水平的归因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信