Clinical pathway for evaluating women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

T. Dunn, C. Stamm, M. Delorit, G. Goldberg
{"title":"Clinical pathway for evaluating women with abnormal uterine bleeding.","authors":"T. Dunn, C. Stamm, M. Delorit, G. Goldberg","doi":"10.1097/00006254-200201000-00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo devise a clinical pathway for evaluating women with abnormal uterine bleeding.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nOne thousand women with the complaint of abnormal uterine bleeding were enrolled. All would have undergone endometrial biopsy based on older recommendations. The patients followed a clinical pathway to determine if an endometrial biopsy was necessary. The pathway divided women into the categories of premenopausal, postmenopausal, low risk and high risk. If one risk factor was present, the patient underwent endometrial biopsy. If there were no risk factors, the patient continued down the pathway with medical therapy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFive hundred seventy endometrial biopsies were performed. Five cases of endometrial cancer and three of complex atypical hyperplasia, both in the postmenopausal, high-risk group, were discovered. Subsequent reviews revealed that no cases of endometrial cancer were missed or developed in the two years following the initial complaint.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUtilization of a clinical pathway reduced the number of endometrial biopsies by 50%. The introduction of clinical pathways at our institution was done successfully in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200201000-00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To devise a clinical pathway for evaluating women with abnormal uterine bleeding. STUDY DESIGN One thousand women with the complaint of abnormal uterine bleeding were enrolled. All would have undergone endometrial biopsy based on older recommendations. The patients followed a clinical pathway to determine if an endometrial biopsy was necessary. The pathway divided women into the categories of premenopausal, postmenopausal, low risk and high risk. If one risk factor was present, the patient underwent endometrial biopsy. If there were no risk factors, the patient continued down the pathway with medical therapy. RESULTS Five hundred seventy endometrial biopsies were performed. Five cases of endometrial cancer and three of complex atypical hyperplasia, both in the postmenopausal, high-risk group, were discovered. Subsequent reviews revealed that no cases of endometrial cancer were missed or developed in the two years following the initial complaint. CONCLUSION Utilization of a clinical pathway reduced the number of endometrial biopsies by 50%. The introduction of clinical pathways at our institution was done successfully in the evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding.
评价女性子宫异常出血的临床途径。
目的建立评价子宫异常出血的临床途径。研究设计入组了1000名主诉子宫异常出血的妇女。根据以前的建议,所有人都接受了子宫内膜活检。患者遵循临床途径确定子宫内膜活检是否必要。该途径将妇女分为绝经前、绝经后、低危和高风险。如果存在一种危险因素,患者接受子宫内膜活检。如果没有危险因素,患者将继续进行药物治疗。结果共行子宫内膜活检570例。在绝经后高危人群中发现子宫内膜癌5例,复杂不典型增生3例。随后的回顾显示,在最初的投诉后的两年内,没有子宫内膜癌的病例被遗漏或发展。结论采用临床路径可使子宫内膜活检次数减少50%。临床路径在我院的引入成功地评价了子宫异常出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信