Field Development Optimization Under Uncertainty and Risk Assessment of Carbonate Massive Reservoir in West Kazakhstan

Asfandiyar Bigeldiyev, Samat Ramatullayev, D. Kovyazin, D. Sidorov, V. Malyshev, Gernort Vogtlander, G. Wall, D. Lungershausen, Talgat Nauruzov
{"title":"Field Development Optimization Under Uncertainty and Risk Assessment of Carbonate Massive Reservoir in West Kazakhstan","authors":"Asfandiyar Bigeldiyev, Samat Ramatullayev, D. Kovyazin, D. Sidorov, V. Malyshev, Gernort Vogtlander, G. Wall, D. Lungershausen, Talgat Nauruzov","doi":"10.2118/212062-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir modeling has become an indispensable tool in the oil and gas industry to measure risk associated with alternative production scenarios. It is no secret that nowadays more and more operators use deterministic approach for history matching but even so, the task remains technically challenging. Given a large number of uncertainties associated with subsurface models, it has become critical to produce a set of history-matched models and use them for risk assessment in predicting the future performance of the reservoir.\n Quantification of uncertainties is a vital process in complex fields to ensure a proper field development plan (FDP) is in place. In this paper, we present a comprehensive workflow that incorporates all processes from building static and dynamic models to producing ensemble of history matched models. To assess the mismatch with historical production data, a number of geological realizations were created and simulated using a variety of uncertainty parameters. Based on the obtained mismatch value, the posterior probability distribution for uncertain parameters updated. Different optimization methods are used to find candidates with improved match quality, and this loop is repeated until a set of diverse history-matched models are generated. These calibrated reservoir models are then used to estimate prediction uncertainties for further FDP optimization.\n This study is focused on automating workflows and generating multiple geological realizations that produce a set of history-matched models to probabilistically estimate prediction uncertainties and optimize FDP. We also show how these models are critical in the process of decision making and risk evaluation.","PeriodicalId":394241,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, November 15, 2022","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, November 15, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212062-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reservoir modeling has become an indispensable tool in the oil and gas industry to measure risk associated with alternative production scenarios. It is no secret that nowadays more and more operators use deterministic approach for history matching but even so, the task remains technically challenging. Given a large number of uncertainties associated with subsurface models, it has become critical to produce a set of history-matched models and use them for risk assessment in predicting the future performance of the reservoir. Quantification of uncertainties is a vital process in complex fields to ensure a proper field development plan (FDP) is in place. In this paper, we present a comprehensive workflow that incorporates all processes from building static and dynamic models to producing ensemble of history matched models. To assess the mismatch with historical production data, a number of geological realizations were created and simulated using a variety of uncertainty parameters. Based on the obtained mismatch value, the posterior probability distribution for uncertain parameters updated. Different optimization methods are used to find candidates with improved match quality, and this loop is repeated until a set of diverse history-matched models are generated. These calibrated reservoir models are then used to estimate prediction uncertainties for further FDP optimization. This study is focused on automating workflows and generating multiple geological realizations that produce a set of history-matched models to probabilistically estimate prediction uncertainties and optimize FDP. We also show how these models are critical in the process of decision making and risk evaluation.
哈萨克西部碳酸盐岩块状储层不确定性条件下油田开发优化及风险评价
油藏建模已经成为油气行业衡量替代生产方案相关风险的不可或缺的工具。如今越来越多的运营商使用确定性方法进行历史匹配已经不是什么秘密,但即便如此,这项任务在技术上仍然具有挑战性。考虑到与地下模型相关的大量不确定性,建立一套历史匹配模型并将其用于预测储层未来动态的风险评估就变得至关重要。在复杂的油田中,量化不确定性是确保制定适当的油田开发计划(FDP)的重要过程。在本文中,我们提出了一个综合的工作流,它包含了从构建静态和动态模型到生成历史匹配模型集合的所有过程。为了评估与历史生产数据的不匹配,我们创建了许多地质实现,并使用各种不确定性参数进行了模拟。根据得到的失配值,更新不确定参数的后验概率分布。使用不同的优化方法来寻找具有改进匹配质量的候选模型,并重复此循环,直到生成一组不同的历史匹配模型。这些校正后的储层模型随后用于估计预测不确定性,以进一步优化FDP。这项研究的重点是自动化工作流程和生成多种地质实现,这些实现产生一组历史匹配模型,以概率估计预测不确定性并优化FDP。我们还展示了这些模型在决策和风险评估过程中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信