Analysis of Science Literacy Teaching Book Class XI at SMA Negeri Surakarta on Acid-Base Material

Nanda Pertiwi, N. Nurhayati, S. Saputro
{"title":"Analysis of Science Literacy Teaching Book Class XI at SMA Negeri Surakarta on Acid-Base Material","authors":"Nanda Pertiwi, N. Nurhayati, S. Saputro","doi":"10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.11719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive research aims to explain the scope of scientific literacy in chemistry textbooks used in Surakarta. This research data are in the form of quantity from 4 categories of scientific literacy with 26 subcategories as indicators of grouping text units in textbook analysis. The data sources in this study were five textbooks for class XI with different publishers. The technique of taking the object of research uses a purposive sampling technique. Based on the results of data analysis based on the category of scientific literacy, the average results of the proportion of scientific literacy are obtained as follows: (1) Science as a body of knowledge was 69.98% (2 ) Science as a way of an investigation by 14.43% (3) Science as a way of thinking by 10.63% (4) Interaction of science with technology and society by 4.98%. The results of the fulfilment of the scientific literacy category in book A have a ratio of the category of science as knowledge: science as a way of investigation: interaction of science, technology, and society: category of science as a way of thinking that is 9:1:1:1. The ratio in book B is 6:2:0:1, the ratio in book C is 4:2:0:1, the ratio in book D is 9:0:0:1, and the ratio in book E is 6:2:1: 1. Therefore, from the results of this study, the recommended textbook for use is the book E because it includes aspects of scientific literacy that are complete and more balanced than the other four books.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v5i1.11719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This descriptive research aims to explain the scope of scientific literacy in chemistry textbooks used in Surakarta. This research data are in the form of quantity from 4 categories of scientific literacy with 26 subcategories as indicators of grouping text units in textbook analysis. The data sources in this study were five textbooks for class XI with different publishers. The technique of taking the object of research uses a purposive sampling technique. Based on the results of data analysis based on the category of scientific literacy, the average results of the proportion of scientific literacy are obtained as follows: (1) Science as a body of knowledge was 69.98% (2 ) Science as a way of an investigation by 14.43% (3) Science as a way of thinking by 10.63% (4) Interaction of science with technology and society by 4.98%. The results of the fulfilment of the scientific literacy category in book A have a ratio of the category of science as knowledge: science as a way of investigation: interaction of science, technology, and society: category of science as a way of thinking that is 9:1:1:1. The ratio in book B is 6:2:0:1, the ratio in book C is 4:2:0:1, the ratio in book D is 9:0:0:1, and the ratio in book E is 6:2:1: 1. Therefore, from the results of this study, the recommended textbook for use is the book E because it includes aspects of scientific literacy that are complete and more balanced than the other four books.
新加坡文理学院科学素养教材第11课酸碱材料分析
这项描述性研究的目的是解释在泗水使用的化学教科书的科学素养的范围。本研究数据以数量的形式从科学素养的4类中选取26个子类作为教材分析中文本单元分组的指标。本研究的数据来源为五本不同出版社的十一班教材。选取研究对象的技术采用目的性抽样技术。根据基于科学素养范畴的数据分析结果,得出科学素养比例的平均结果为:(1)科学作为一种知识体系占69.98%(2)科学作为一种调查方式占14.43%(3)科学作为一种思维方式占10.63%(4)科学与技术和社会的互动占4.98%。A册科学素养范畴实现的结果是:科学作为知识范畴:科学作为一种研究方式:科学、技术和社会的相互作用:科学作为一种思维方式的范畴,比例为9:1:1:1。B册的比例是6:2:0:1,C册是4:2:0:1,D册是9:0:0:1,E册是6:2:1:1。因此,从本研究的结果来看,推荐使用的教科书是E书,因为它包含了比其他四本书更完整和更平衡的科学素养方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信