{"title":"Guarantees in Ṣukūk between Sharīʿah Objectives and Contract Conditions","authors":"Ali bin Hussein Aidi, M. Salama","doi":"10.4197/islec.32-1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guarantees offered for ṣukūk in Islamic finance have become a problematic\nissue of discussion. From the authors’ perspective, the issue should be approached\nfrom two aspects: one considering the required conditions for the validity of contracts\nand the other considering the Sharīʿah objectives. This research aims to emphasize the\nnecessity of considering the objectives of contracts from a Sharīʿah perspective before\njudging their validity; particularly with regard to guaranteed ṣukūk. To achieve this\ngoal, the research employs two methods: one descriptive and the other analytical as\nwell as critical. The research has concluded that it is not permissible to stipulate\nholding the ṣukūk issuer liable neither for the ṣukūk nominal values nor for a\npredetermined amount of profit; that the idea of holding the ṣukūk issuer responsible\nbased on considering him a joint muḍārib is not founded on solid evidence; that it is\nnot permissible for the muḍārib, partner, or wakīl to be committed to give loan to ṣukūk\nholders when the actual return for ṣukūk is less than expected; that, in some of their\napplications, ṣukūk based on lease ending with ownership involve the impermissible\nʿīnah transaction; that guarantees in ṣukūk contradict Sharīʿah rules when the issuer\nundertakes to purchase the ṣukūk assets at their nominal values at the end of the\nmuḍārabah, mushārakah, or wakālah; and that the criteria to assess Islamic ṣukūk on\nthe basis of Sharīʿah objectives can be divided into: criteria related to the motive,\ncriteria related to the contract structure, and criteria for the outcomes of implementing\nthe product.","PeriodicalId":410187,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Institutions & Financing Practices (Topic)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Institutions & Financing Practices (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4197/islec.32-1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Guarantees offered for ṣukūk in Islamic finance have become a problematic
issue of discussion. From the authors’ perspective, the issue should be approached
from two aspects: one considering the required conditions for the validity of contracts
and the other considering the Sharīʿah objectives. This research aims to emphasize the
necessity of considering the objectives of contracts from a Sharīʿah perspective before
judging their validity; particularly with regard to guaranteed ṣukūk. To achieve this
goal, the research employs two methods: one descriptive and the other analytical as
well as critical. The research has concluded that it is not permissible to stipulate
holding the ṣukūk issuer liable neither for the ṣukūk nominal values nor for a
predetermined amount of profit; that the idea of holding the ṣukūk issuer responsible
based on considering him a joint muḍārib is not founded on solid evidence; that it is
not permissible for the muḍārib, partner, or wakīl to be committed to give loan to ṣukūk
holders when the actual return for ṣukūk is less than expected; that, in some of their
applications, ṣukūk based on lease ending with ownership involve the impermissible
ʿīnah transaction; that guarantees in ṣukūk contradict Sharīʿah rules when the issuer
undertakes to purchase the ṣukūk assets at their nominal values at the end of the
muḍārabah, mushārakah, or wakālah; and that the criteria to assess Islamic ṣukūk on
the basis of Sharīʿah objectives can be divided into: criteria related to the motive,
criteria related to the contract structure, and criteria for the outcomes of implementing
the product.