{"title":"A history of Malawi: 1859–1966","authors":"Geoffrey Traugh","doi":"10.1080/00083968.2013.829947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many on the left will find Marais’ exploration of potentially counter-hegemonic social movements unsatisfactory. He offers reason for hope, but less than most would like. The Landless People’s Movement, shack-dwellers, the rise and fall of the Anti-Poverty Forum, all deserve more attention. Absent here, however, are the challenges taking place within the union-movement, with the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) old guard losing ground as the precariously employed failed to be defended under its umbrella. There is also nothing on South Africa’s regional relations, which are feeding a debate on the nature of imperialism (see Alden and Soko 2005; Biel 2003; Bond 2012, 2006; Bracking 2003; Bracking and Harrison 2003; Lesufi 2006; Samson 2009). Yet Marais does take stock of an era in history, setting South African political economy into a broader global context with a brilliant, integrated analysis. Surely there is room for a critique of his use of Gramsci, though his employment of it here is compelling.","PeriodicalId":172027,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"56","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of African Studies/ La Revue canadienne des études africaines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2013.829947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56
Abstract
Many on the left will find Marais’ exploration of potentially counter-hegemonic social movements unsatisfactory. He offers reason for hope, but less than most would like. The Landless People’s Movement, shack-dwellers, the rise and fall of the Anti-Poverty Forum, all deserve more attention. Absent here, however, are the challenges taking place within the union-movement, with the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU) old guard losing ground as the precariously employed failed to be defended under its umbrella. There is also nothing on South Africa’s regional relations, which are feeding a debate on the nature of imperialism (see Alden and Soko 2005; Biel 2003; Bond 2012, 2006; Bracking 2003; Bracking and Harrison 2003; Lesufi 2006; Samson 2009). Yet Marais does take stock of an era in history, setting South African political economy into a broader global context with a brilliant, integrated analysis. Surely there is room for a critique of his use of Gramsci, though his employment of it here is compelling.
许多左翼人士会发现,玛莱对潜在的反霸权社会运动的探索并不令人满意。他提供了希望的理由,但比大多数人希望的要少。无地人民运动、棚户区居民、反贫困论坛的兴衰,都值得更多关注。然而,这里没有工会运动内部发生的挑战,南非工会大会(COSATU)的守旧势力正在失去阵地,因为不稳定的就业未能在其保护伞下得到保护。也没有提到南非的地区关系,这助长了关于帝国主义本质的辩论(见Alden and Soko 2005;比尔2003;邦德2012,2006;挑选2003;Bracking and Harrison 2003;Lesufi 2006;参孙2009)。然而,玛莱确实对历史上的一个时代进行了盘点,以一种出色的综合分析,将南非的政治经济置于更广阔的全球背景下。当然,他对葛兰西的运用也有批评的余地,尽管他在这里对葛兰西的运用是令人信服的。