Differences in Recovery After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass

Josip Volarić, I. Rudež, Ante Bošnjak
{"title":"Differences in Recovery After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting or Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass","authors":"Josip Volarić, I. Rudež, Ante Bošnjak","doi":"10.47960/2744-2470.2022.1.1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The main part of the study was to determine the lower frequency of postoperative complications and fewer days spent in hospital and in the intensive care unit postoperatively, among patients operated on using the OPCAB method, as opposed to those operated on using the CABG method.Methods: In a cross-sectional, epidemiological study, data were collected and processed from the medical database. The parameters taken into consideration were: the incidence of postoperative complications, the number of days spent in the intensive care unit postoperatively and the number of days spent in the hospital postoperatively. Main findings: From a total of 60 patients operated on at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, 8.33% of patients had postoperative complications. Half of the patients underwent CABG surgery and 13.3% had postoperative complications. The other half who underwent OPCAB surgery had 3.3% postoperative complications. CABG patients spent an average of 2.57 days in the intensive care unit, whereas OPCAB patients spent 2.17 days there.Principal conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference in the number of days spent in the intensive care unit and the incidence of postoperative complications between patients operated by on using the CABG or the OPCAB method.Key words: CABG method, OPCAB method, postoperativecomplication, intensive care unit","PeriodicalId":252537,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Biomedical and Clinical Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Biomedical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47960/2744-2470.2022.1.1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. The main part of the study was to determine the lower frequency of postoperative complications and fewer days spent in hospital and in the intensive care unit postoperatively, among patients operated on using the OPCAB method, as opposed to those operated on using the CABG method.Methods: In a cross-sectional, epidemiological study, data were collected and processed from the medical database. The parameters taken into consideration were: the incidence of postoperative complications, the number of days spent in the intensive care unit postoperatively and the number of days spent in the hospital postoperatively. Main findings: From a total of 60 patients operated on at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, 8.33% of patients had postoperative complications. Half of the patients underwent CABG surgery and 13.3% had postoperative complications. The other half who underwent OPCAB surgery had 3.3% postoperative complications. CABG patients spent an average of 2.57 days in the intensive care unit, whereas OPCAB patients spent 2.17 days there.Principal conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference in the number of days spent in the intensive care unit and the incidence of postoperative complications between patients operated by on using the CABG or the OPCAB method.Key words: CABG method, OPCAB method, postoperativecomplication, intensive care unit
冠状动脉旁路移植术与非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术术后恢复的差异
背景。该研究的主要部分是确定使用OPCAB方法手术的患者与使用CABG方法手术的患者相比,术后并发症的发生率较低,术后住院和重症监护病房的时间较短。方法:采用横断面流行病学研究方法,从医学数据库中收集资料并进行处理。考虑的参数是:术后并发症的发生率、术后在重症监护病房的天数和术后住院的天数。主要发现:本院心脏外科收治的60例患者中,有8.33%的患者出现术后并发症。半数患者行冠脉搭桥手术,13.3%患者出现术后并发症。另一半接受OPCAB手术的患者术后并发症发生率为3.3%。CABG患者在重症监护病房的平均时间为2.57天,而OPCAB患者在重症监护病房的平均时间为2.17天。主要结论:CABG和OPCAB两种手术方式患者在重症监护病房的住院天数和术后并发症发生率无统计学差异。关键词:CABG法,OPCAB法,术后并发症,重症监护病房
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信