Choice History Biases Depend on Environmental Stability and State Uncertainty

A. Braun, Anne E. Urai, T. Donner
{"title":"Choice History Biases Depend on Environmental Stability and State Uncertainty","authors":"A. Braun, Anne E. Urai, T. Donner","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1237-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceptual decisions under uncertainty are often biased by the history of preceding events. For example, observers tend to repeat (or alternate) their judgments of the sensory environment more often than expected by chance (Braun, Urai, & Donner, 2018; Frund, Wichmann, & Macke, 2014). We test the idea that such choice history biases arise from the context-dependent accumulation of internal decision signals across trials (Glaze, Kable, & Gold, 2015). Observers performed a standard visual random dot motion discrimination task near psychophysical threshold in several different environments. Those were made up of different levels of auto-correlation between the stimulus categories in successive trials (Repetitive, Random, or Alternating), and the absence or presence of single-trial outcome feedback. Participants adjusted both the strength and the sign of their history biases to the environment. When no feedback was available this adjustment was driven by previous choices modulated by confidence. When feedback was provided the adjustment was predominantly based on previous stimuli.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"314 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1237-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceptual decisions under uncertainty are often biased by the history of preceding events. For example, observers tend to repeat (or alternate) their judgments of the sensory environment more often than expected by chance (Braun, Urai, & Donner, 2018; Frund, Wichmann, & Macke, 2014). We test the idea that such choice history biases arise from the context-dependent accumulation of internal decision signals across trials (Glaze, Kable, & Gold, 2015). Observers performed a standard visual random dot motion discrimination task near psychophysical threshold in several different environments. Those were made up of different levels of auto-correlation between the stimulus categories in successive trials (Repetitive, Random, or Alternating), and the absence or presence of single-trial outcome feedback. Participants adjusted both the strength and the sign of their history biases to the environment. When no feedback was available this adjustment was driven by previous choices modulated by confidence. When feedback was provided the adjustment was predominantly based on previous stimuli.
选择历史偏差取决于环境稳定性和状态不确定性
在不确定的情况下,感知决策往往会受到之前事件的历史影响。例如,观察者倾向于重复(或交替)他们对感官环境的判断,而不是偶然的预期(Braun, Urai, & Donner, 2018;Frund, Wichmann, & Macke, 2014)。我们测试了这样一种观点,即这种选择历史偏差源于试验中内部决策信号的上下文依赖积累(Glaze, Kable, & Gold, 2015)。在不同的环境下,观察者在心理物理阈值附近进行标准的视觉随机点运动辨别任务。这些是由连续试验(重复、随机或交替)中刺激类别之间不同程度的自相关性以及单次试验结果反馈的缺失或存在组成的。参与者根据环境调整了他们的历史偏见的强度和标志。当没有反馈时,这种调整是由先前的选择驱动的,并受到信心的调节。当提供反馈时,调整主要基于先前的刺激。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信