Of post-animal meat and other forms of food innovation: a critical and intersectional reading from the perspective of political ecology

Alice Dal Gobbo
{"title":"Of post-animal meat and other forms of food innovation: a critical and intersectional reading from the perspective of political ecology","authors":"Alice Dal Gobbo","doi":"10.1332/rvdo1043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This commentary is a reflection on cultured meat and, more generally, food innovation, articulated from the perspective of political ecology (for a proposal around the ‘political ecology of food’ see Moragues-Faus and Marsden, 2017). This approach allows to critically investigate the status and role of novel foods in the context of the ecologic crisis, highlighting the complex entanglements of power, labour and value that subtend processes of food innovation and shape imaginaries of future food systems, as well as pathways of sustainability. As such, political ecology also calls for a reflection on food politics at large, envisioning transformative practices that question current arrangements of gender, class, race, species. In its unwillingness to ‘solve’ or close down the vast problem of food innovation, political ecology highlights ambiguities, risks, but also opportunities, as tools to guide a radical political imagination around food in the context of the contemporary ecological crisis. This stands in contrast with the polarising and partial way in which cultured meat tends to be represented in present public debates. The Italian ‘ban’ on cultured meat that is likely to be introduced is particularly interesting and it will serve as a starting point for this commentary.","PeriodicalId":443072,"journal":{"name":"Consumption and Society","volume":"11 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Consumption and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/rvdo1043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This commentary is a reflection on cultured meat and, more generally, food innovation, articulated from the perspective of political ecology (for a proposal around the ‘political ecology of food’ see Moragues-Faus and Marsden, 2017). This approach allows to critically investigate the status and role of novel foods in the context of the ecologic crisis, highlighting the complex entanglements of power, labour and value that subtend processes of food innovation and shape imaginaries of future food systems, as well as pathways of sustainability. As such, political ecology also calls for a reflection on food politics at large, envisioning transformative practices that question current arrangements of gender, class, race, species. In its unwillingness to ‘solve’ or close down the vast problem of food innovation, political ecology highlights ambiguities, risks, but also opportunities, as tools to guide a radical political imagination around food in the context of the contemporary ecological crisis. This stands in contrast with the polarising and partial way in which cultured meat tends to be represented in present public debates. The Italian ‘ban’ on cultured meat that is likely to be introduced is particularly interesting and it will serve as a starting point for this commentary.
后动物时代的肉类和其他形式的食品创新:从政治生态学的角度进行批判性和交叉性的阅读
这篇评论是对人造肉的反思,更广泛地说,是从政治生态学的角度阐述的食品创新(关于“食品政治生态学”的建议,参见morague - faus和Marsden, 2017)。这种方法允许在生态危机的背景下批判性地调查新型食品的地位和作用,突出了权力、劳动力和价值的复杂纠缠,这些纠缠支撑着食品创新的过程,塑造了未来食品系统的想象,以及可持续发展的途径。因此,政治生态学也要求对粮食政治进行反思,设想对当前性别、阶级、种族和物种的安排提出质疑的变革实践。在不愿意“解决”或关闭食品创新的巨大问题时,政治生态学突出了模糊性,风险,但也有机会,作为在当代生态危机背景下指导围绕食品的激进政治想象的工具。这与目前公共辩论中培养肉倾向于代表的两极分化和局部方式形成鲜明对比。意大利对人造肉的“禁令”可能会被引入,这是特别有趣的,它将作为本评论的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信