In Vacuo and In Situ Evaluation of SIMD Codecs

A. Trotman, Jimmy J. Lin
{"title":"In Vacuo and In Situ Evaluation of SIMD Codecs","authors":"A. Trotman, Jimmy J. Lin","doi":"10.1145/3015022.3015023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The size of a search engine index and the time to search are inextricably related through the compression codec. This investigation examines this tradeoff using several relatively unexplored SIMD-based codecs including QMX, TurboPackV, and TurboPFor. It uses (the non-SIMD) OPTPFor as a baseline. Four new variants of QMX are introduced and also compared. Those variants include optimizations for space and for time. Experiments were conducted on the TREC .gov2 collection using topics 701-850, in crawl order and in URL order. The results suggest that there is very little difference between these codecs, but that the reference implementation of QMX performs well.","PeriodicalId":334601,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Document Computing Symposium","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Document Computing Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3015022.3015023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The size of a search engine index and the time to search are inextricably related through the compression codec. This investigation examines this tradeoff using several relatively unexplored SIMD-based codecs including QMX, TurboPackV, and TurboPFor. It uses (the non-SIMD) OPTPFor as a baseline. Four new variants of QMX are introduced and also compared. Those variants include optimizations for space and for time. Experiments were conducted on the TREC .gov2 collection using topics 701-850, in crawl order and in URL order. The results suggest that there is very little difference between these codecs, but that the reference implementation of QMX performs well.
SIMD编解码器的真空和原位评价
通过压缩编解码器,搜索引擎索引的大小和搜索时间是密不可分的。本调查使用几个相对未开发的基于simd的编解码器(包括QMX、TurboPackV和TurboPFor)来检查这种权衡。它使用(非simd) OPTPFor作为基线。介绍了QMX的四种新变体,并进行了比较。这些变体包括对空间和时间的优化。实验在主题701-850的TREC .gov2集合上,按抓取顺序和URL顺序进行。结果表明,这些编解码器之间的差异很小,但QMX的参考实现表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信