Trolling and its communicative potential

N. Diachenko, Anna Voinalovych
{"title":"Trolling and its communicative potential","authors":"N. Diachenko, Anna Voinalovych","doi":"10.31499/2415-8828.1.2023.281355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modern world is a world of rapid changes, large information flows and almost continuous communication. In recent years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainians have been forced to limit real contacts, which has significantly increased the share of online communication. However, the development of the information society is accompanied by the spread of not only positive but also negative practices in the virtual world. One of the most common is trolling. \nThe purpose of the article is to give a comprehensive description of trolling as one of the modern communicative practices, including to consider the essence of the concepts of «troll», «trolling», to determine the main motives and signs of trolling, its communicative specificity; present the phenomenon of trolling in dynamics, find out the place and semantics of trolling in the linguistic consciousness of modern Ukrainians. \nThe following methods were used for the study: comparison, observation, descriptive method and its main techniques – inventory and systematization of language units, questionnaire method, classification method, cognitive interpretation method, elements of the statistical method. \nBased on the analysis of the concepts of «troll», «trolling», the main motives and signs of trolling, its communicative specificity are determined. It has been established that in science trolling is considered mainly as a kind of virtual interaction in blogs, social networks, Internet forums, when the activity of the addressee is aimed at manipulation, insult, conflict or positive ridicule, exposing phenomena, objects, actions, etc. As the study showed, despite all the negatives associated with the concept of «trolling», this type of communicative interaction also has a positive side. \nSince one of the tasks was to study the attitude of Ukrainians towards trolling in dynamics, experimental data were used for this. The purpose of our survey was to identify the attitude of modern youth to the phenomenon under consideration and compare the information received with the established one. Based on the answers to the questionnaires, it can be concluded that in the language picture of the world of modern Ukrainian academic youth, trolling is perceived mainly as a negative phenomenon. A vivid evidence of the preservation of the primary, purely negative perception are the lexemes that characterize a typical troll: evil, cunning, treacherous, cruel, boorish, provocateur, ruthless, immoral, etc. \nAt the same time, we also traced the dynamics of the perception of trolling, which is confirmed by the words used by the respondents (cool, humorous, credit, best) and gives reason to interpret the phenomenon under consideration as positive as well. \nIt was revealed that although trolling is more viewed as a destructive phenomenon, a means of manipulation, but if it is aimed at motivating constructive actions and meeting the needs of both parties, there is every reason to define it as a constructive communicative practice.","PeriodicalId":180896,"journal":{"name":"Philological Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31499/2415-8828.1.2023.281355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modern world is a world of rapid changes, large information flows and almost continuous communication. In recent years, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukrainians have been forced to limit real contacts, which has significantly increased the share of online communication. However, the development of the information society is accompanied by the spread of not only positive but also negative practices in the virtual world. One of the most common is trolling. The purpose of the article is to give a comprehensive description of trolling as one of the modern communicative practices, including to consider the essence of the concepts of «troll», «trolling», to determine the main motives and signs of trolling, its communicative specificity; present the phenomenon of trolling in dynamics, find out the place and semantics of trolling in the linguistic consciousness of modern Ukrainians. The following methods were used for the study: comparison, observation, descriptive method and its main techniques – inventory and systematization of language units, questionnaire method, classification method, cognitive interpretation method, elements of the statistical method. Based on the analysis of the concepts of «troll», «trolling», the main motives and signs of trolling, its communicative specificity are determined. It has been established that in science trolling is considered mainly as a kind of virtual interaction in blogs, social networks, Internet forums, when the activity of the addressee is aimed at manipulation, insult, conflict or positive ridicule, exposing phenomena, objects, actions, etc. As the study showed, despite all the negatives associated with the concept of «trolling», this type of communicative interaction also has a positive side. Since one of the tasks was to study the attitude of Ukrainians towards trolling in dynamics, experimental data were used for this. The purpose of our survey was to identify the attitude of modern youth to the phenomenon under consideration and compare the information received with the established one. Based on the answers to the questionnaires, it can be concluded that in the language picture of the world of modern Ukrainian academic youth, trolling is perceived mainly as a negative phenomenon. A vivid evidence of the preservation of the primary, purely negative perception are the lexemes that characterize a typical troll: evil, cunning, treacherous, cruel, boorish, provocateur, ruthless, immoral, etc. At the same time, we also traced the dynamics of the perception of trolling, which is confirmed by the words used by the respondents (cool, humorous, credit, best) and gives reason to interpret the phenomenon under consideration as positive as well. It was revealed that although trolling is more viewed as a destructive phenomenon, a means of manipulation, but if it is aimed at motivating constructive actions and meeting the needs of both parties, there is every reason to define it as a constructive communicative practice.
网络喷子和它的交流潜力
现代世界是一个瞬息万变、信息流大、几乎不间断交流的世界。近年来,由于新冠肺炎大流行和俄罗斯全面入侵乌克兰,乌克兰人被迫限制实际接触,这使得在线交流的比例大幅增加。然而,伴随着信息社会的发展,虚拟世界中既有积极的做法,也有消极的做法。最常见的一种是trolling。本文的目的是对网络喷子作为现代交际行为之一进行全面的描述,包括考虑“喷子”、“喷子”等概念的本质,确定网络喷子的主要动机和标志,其交际特殊性;从动态的角度来呈现网络挑衅现象,找出网络挑衅在现代乌克兰人语言意识中的地位和语义。本研究采用了以下方法:比较法、观察法、描述法及其主要技术——语言单位的清查和系统化、问卷调查法、分类法、认知解释法、要素统计法。通过对“喷子”概念的分析,确定了“喷子”的主要动机和表征,确定了其交际特殊性。已经确定,在科学上,trolling主要被认为是博客、社交网络、互联网论坛上的一种虚拟互动,当收件人的活动旨在操纵、侮辱、冲突或积极嘲笑,揭露现象、对象、行为等。正如研究所显示的那样,尽管与“trolling”概念相关的所有负面影响,这种类型的交流互动也有积极的一面。由于其中一项任务是研究乌克兰人对动态拖钓的态度,因此使用了实验数据。我们调查的目的是确定现代青年对正在考虑的现象的态度,并将收到的信息与既定的信息进行比较。根据问卷的答案,可以得出结论,在现代乌克兰学术青年世界的语言图景中,trolling主要被视为一种负面现象。典型巨魔的典型特征是:邪恶、狡猾、奸诈、残忍、粗鲁、挑衅、无情、不道德等词汇,这生动地证明了原始的、纯粹的负面感知的保存。与此同时,我们还追踪了对网络喷子的看法的动态,这一点得到了受访者使用的词汇(酷、幽默、信用、最好)的证实,并给出了理由将正在考虑的现象解释为积极的。研究发现,虽然网络挑衅更多地被视为一种破坏性的现象,一种操纵手段,但如果它的目的是激发建设性的行动,满足双方的需求,则完全有理由将其定义为一种建设性的交际行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信