Performance of Known Ratings-Based Multi-Criteria Recommender System for Housing Selection

Yunifa Miftachul Arif, Muhammad Farid Muhtarom, Hani Nurhayati
{"title":"Performance of Known Ratings-Based Multi-Criteria Recommender System for Housing Selection","authors":"Yunifa Miftachul Arif, Muhammad Farid Muhtarom, Hani Nurhayati","doi":"10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Housing developments are increasingly massive, and the lack of available information makes prospective customers experience difficulties in choosing a housing. These conditions resulted in the need for a recommendation system to assist consumers in choosing a place to live. In this study, we propose using the Multi-Criteria Recommender System (MCRS) to produce the most recommended housing selection recommendations in a case study of five housing complexes in Malang Raya. The system generates recommendations based on known user rating of 14 criteria and an overall rating (R0) stored in the database. In the experimental stage, the MCRS system in this study used four different methods: cosine, adjust cosine, Pearson correlation, and spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. The test results show that the recommendation system with each similarity method can produce housing recommendations by displaying the three most relevant housing recommendations to the user. Next, we use a confusion matrix to analyze the accuracy of the recommendations generated by the four similarity methods. The results of the confusion matrix calculation show that the average accuracy value for cosine-based similarity is 63.8%, the adjusted-cosine similarity is 70.4%, the Pearson correlation is 88.7%, and the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient is 75.57%.","PeriodicalId":256184,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Computer Science, Information Technology and Engineering (ICCoSITE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCoSITE57641.2023.10127720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Housing developments are increasingly massive, and the lack of available information makes prospective customers experience difficulties in choosing a housing. These conditions resulted in the need for a recommendation system to assist consumers in choosing a place to live. In this study, we propose using the Multi-Criteria Recommender System (MCRS) to produce the most recommended housing selection recommendations in a case study of five housing complexes in Malang Raya. The system generates recommendations based on known user rating of 14 criteria and an overall rating (R0) stored in the database. In the experimental stage, the MCRS system in this study used four different methods: cosine, adjust cosine, Pearson correlation, and spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. The test results show that the recommendation system with each similarity method can produce housing recommendations by displaying the three most relevant housing recommendations to the user. Next, we use a confusion matrix to analyze the accuracy of the recommendations generated by the four similarity methods. The results of the confusion matrix calculation show that the average accuracy value for cosine-based similarity is 63.8%, the adjusted-cosine similarity is 70.4%, the Pearson correlation is 88.7%, and the Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient is 75.57%.
基于已知评级的多标准住房选择推荐系统的性能
住房开发规模越来越大,缺乏可用信息使潜在客户在选择住房时遇到困难。这些情况导致需要一个推荐系统来帮助消费者选择居住的地方。在这项研究中,我们建议使用多标准推荐系统(MCRS)来产生最推荐的住房选择建议,并以玛琅拉雅的五个住宅区为例进行研究。系统根据数据库中存储的14个标准的已知用户评分和总体评分(R0)生成推荐。在实验阶段,本研究的MCRS系统使用了余弦、调整余弦、Pearson相关和spearman秩序相关系数四种不同的方法。测试结果表明,每种相似度方法的推荐系统都可以通过向用户显示最相关的三个住房推荐来产生住房推荐。接下来,我们使用混淆矩阵来分析四种相似度方法生成的推荐的准确性。混淆矩阵计算结果表明,基于余弦的相似度平均准确率为63.8%,调整余弦相似度平均准确率为70.4%,Pearson相关系数为88.7%,Spearman秩序相关系数为75.57%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信