Bias in Instrumental-Variable Estimators of Fixed-Effect Models for Count Data

ERN EM Feeds Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3937105
Koen Jochmans
{"title":"Bias in Instrumental-Variable Estimators of Fixed-Effect Models for Count Data","authors":"Koen Jochmans","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3937105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note looks at the properties of instrumental-variable estimators of count data models in the presence of individual effects. We show that fixed-effect versions of the estimators of Mullahy (1997) and Windmeijer and Santos Silva (1997) are inconsistent under conventional asymptotics, in general, and that inference based on them in long panels requires bias correction. Such corrections are derived and their effectiveness is investigated in numerical experiments. We further show that consistent estimation in short panels is nonetheless possible in the setting underlying Mullahy’s (1997) approach using a differencing strategy.","PeriodicalId":261816,"journal":{"name":"ERN EM Feeds","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN EM Feeds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3937105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This note looks at the properties of instrumental-variable estimators of count data models in the presence of individual effects. We show that fixed-effect versions of the estimators of Mullahy (1997) and Windmeijer and Santos Silva (1997) are inconsistent under conventional asymptotics, in general, and that inference based on them in long panels requires bias correction. Such corrections are derived and their effectiveness is investigated in numerical experiments. We further show that consistent estimation in short panels is nonetheless possible in the setting underlying Mullahy’s (1997) approach using a differencing strategy.
计数数据固定效应模型的工具变量估计的偏差
本笔记着眼于在存在个体效应的情况下计数数据模型的工具变量估计量的性质。我们表明,Mullahy(1997)和Windmeijer和Santos Silva(1997)的固定效应版本的估计量在常规渐近性下通常是不一致的,并且在长面板中基于它们的推断需要偏差校正。推导了这些修正,并通过数值实验验证了其有效性。我们进一步表明,在使用差异策略的Mullahy(1997)方法的基础设置中,短面板中的一致估计仍然是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信