Lowering Barriers to Interscholastic Undergraduate Initiatives at the University of Virginia

Allison Lee, Greg Connelly, Raewyn L. Haines, A. Lyons, Timothy R. Eddy, Y. Haimes
{"title":"Lowering Barriers to Interscholastic Undergraduate Initiatives at the University of Virginia","authors":"Allison Lee, Greg Connelly, Raewyn L. Haines, A. Lyons, Timothy R. Eddy, Y. Haimes","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Founded with a vision for well-rounded education, the University of Virginia is a Complex System of Systems with subsystems that interface to fulfill the University's core purposes. The interdependence and interconnectedness of subsystems, including schools and departments, provide insight into the University's capability to bridge disciplinary boundaries in offering holistic learning opportunities to faculty and students. Interscholastic courses, classes offered in two or more schools; and interdisciplinary courses, classes combining two or more disciplines, are examples of such opportunities. Thus, the team focused its analytical and modeling efforts on identifying obstacles to these courses and to other programs that could cultivate both a knowledge of disciplinary perspectives and skills in disciplinary integration at the undergraduate level. Interviews with administrators and professors as well as a survey distributed to professors of interscholastic courses were used to gather qualitative data about experiences in forming and administering courses listed in both the School of Engineering and Applied Science and the College of Arts and Sciences. Students in both schools were also surveyed about their awareness and interest in interdisciplinary and interscholastic classes. This systems analysis utilized both quantitative data and, primarily, qualitative insights regarding personal motivations and attitudes in understanding the intricacies of the University as a Complex System of Systems and identifying contradictory objectives, key limiting resources, and relevant cultural factors. This research highlights existing impediments to interdisciplinary and interscholastic collaboration within the University, as well as recommendations on how these barriers can be lowered.","PeriodicalId":265421,"journal":{"name":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Founded with a vision for well-rounded education, the University of Virginia is a Complex System of Systems with subsystems that interface to fulfill the University's core purposes. The interdependence and interconnectedness of subsystems, including schools and departments, provide insight into the University's capability to bridge disciplinary boundaries in offering holistic learning opportunities to faculty and students. Interscholastic courses, classes offered in two or more schools; and interdisciplinary courses, classes combining two or more disciplines, are examples of such opportunities. Thus, the team focused its analytical and modeling efforts on identifying obstacles to these courses and to other programs that could cultivate both a knowledge of disciplinary perspectives and skills in disciplinary integration at the undergraduate level. Interviews with administrators and professors as well as a survey distributed to professors of interscholastic courses were used to gather qualitative data about experiences in forming and administering courses listed in both the School of Engineering and Applied Science and the College of Arts and Sciences. Students in both schools were also surveyed about their awareness and interest in interdisciplinary and interscholastic classes. This systems analysis utilized both quantitative data and, primarily, qualitative insights regarding personal motivations and attitudes in understanding the intricacies of the University as a Complex System of Systems and identifying contradictory objectives, key limiting resources, and relevant cultural factors. This research highlights existing impediments to interdisciplinary and interscholastic collaboration within the University, as well as recommendations on how these barriers can be lowered.
降低弗吉尼亚大学校际本科项目的门槛
弗吉尼亚大学以全面的教育为愿景而建立,是一个复杂的系统系统,其子系统相互连接以实现大学的核心目标。包括学院和部门在内的子系统相互依存和相互联系,使大学能够跨越学科界限,为教师和学生提供全面的学习机会。校际课程,在两所或两所以上学校开设的课程;跨学科课程,即结合两个或多个学科的课程,就是这种机会的例子。因此,该团队将分析和建模工作集中在确定这些课程和其他项目的障碍上,这些项目既可以培养学科视角的知识,也可以培养本科阶段学科整合的技能。对管理人员和教授的访谈以及对跨学院课程教授的调查被用来收集关于工程与应用科学学院和艺术与科学学院所列课程的形成和管理经验的定性数据。两所学校的学生还被调查了他们对跨学科和校际课程的认识和兴趣。这种系统分析利用了定量数据,主要是关于个人动机和态度的定性见解,以理解大学作为一个复杂系统的复杂系统的复杂性,并确定矛盾的目标、关键的限制资源和相关的文化因素。这项研究强调了大学内部跨学科和校际合作的现有障碍,以及如何降低这些障碍的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信