The system of organs of state power for the protection of human rights in the sphere of national security

D. Chyzhov
{"title":"The system of organs of state power for the protection of human rights in the sphere of national security","authors":"D. Chyzhov","doi":"10.56215/04212202.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study is to provide scientifically based conclusions on the definition of the system of state authorities for protecting human rights in the field of national security in the context of modern challenges and threats based on scientific research. The methodological basis of the study is a complete and coordinated system of methods, which allowed properly analysing the subject matter, in particular, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction were used. The theoretical basis of this publication is the papers by Ukrainian researchers devoted to the study of state authorities on the protection of human rights in the field of national security. The scientific originality of the publication is conditioned by the fact that it included a systematic analysis of legal enactments in the field of legal regulation of the system of state authorities for the protection of human rights in the field of national security. It is established that the activities aimed at the protection of human rights and national security are bilateral in nature: the protection of human rights guarantees state security – and protection of state security safeguards human rights. The study highlights the incompleteness of the reform of this system of bodies that certify the shortcomings of the legal regulation of their activities, in particular: 1) the National Guard of Ukraine has the status of a military formation. At the same time, the National Guard of Ukraine is a military formation with law enforcement functions, which belongs to the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine; 2) the National Police of Ukraine as the central executive authority belongs to the security and defence sector. At the same time, the Law of Ukraine “On Central Executive Authorities” does not specify the National Police as the central executive authority; 3) the subjects of the intelligence community among others, according to the Law of Ukraine “On intelligence”, is the security service of Ukraine. However, in Part 2 of Article 12 of the Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine”, the Security Service of Ukraine is defined as a separate body in the field of ensuring national security. It is noted that the double indication of the same bodies in the system of state authorities for the protection of human rights in the field of national security is legally unsound","PeriodicalId":334836,"journal":{"name":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ûridičnij časopis Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/04212202.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to provide scientifically based conclusions on the definition of the system of state authorities for protecting human rights in the field of national security in the context of modern challenges and threats based on scientific research. The methodological basis of the study is a complete and coordinated system of methods, which allowed properly analysing the subject matter, in particular, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, and deduction were used. The theoretical basis of this publication is the papers by Ukrainian researchers devoted to the study of state authorities on the protection of human rights in the field of national security. The scientific originality of the publication is conditioned by the fact that it included a systematic analysis of legal enactments in the field of legal regulation of the system of state authorities for the protection of human rights in the field of national security. It is established that the activities aimed at the protection of human rights and national security are bilateral in nature: the protection of human rights guarantees state security – and protection of state security safeguards human rights. The study highlights the incompleteness of the reform of this system of bodies that certify the shortcomings of the legal regulation of their activities, in particular: 1) the National Guard of Ukraine has the status of a military formation. At the same time, the National Guard of Ukraine is a military formation with law enforcement functions, which belongs to the system of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine; 2) the National Police of Ukraine as the central executive authority belongs to the security and defence sector. At the same time, the Law of Ukraine “On Central Executive Authorities” does not specify the National Police as the central executive authority; 3) the subjects of the intelligence community among others, according to the Law of Ukraine “On intelligence”, is the security service of Ukraine. However, in Part 2 of Article 12 of the Law of Ukraine “On National Security of Ukraine”, the Security Service of Ukraine is defined as a separate body in the field of ensuring national security. It is noted that the double indication of the same bodies in the system of state authorities for the protection of human rights in the field of national security is legally unsound
在国家安全领域保障人权的国家权力机关制度
该研究的目的是在科学研究的基础上,在现代挑战和威胁的背景下,对国家安全领域中保护人权的国家权力体系的定义提供科学的结论。本研究的方法论基础是一个完整而协调的方法体系,它允许对主题进行适当的分析,特别是使用了分析,综合,归纳和演绎方法。本出版物的理论基础是乌克兰研究人员致力于研究国家当局在国家安全领域保护人权的论文。该出版物的科学独创性取决于这样一个事实,即它包括了对国家安全领域中保护人权的国家当局制度的法律规制领域的法律法规的系统分析。保护人权和国家安全的活动具有双边性质:保护人权保障国家安全,保护国家安全保障人权。该研究报告强调了这一机构制度改革的不完整,这证明了对其活动的法律管制的缺点,特别是:1)乌克兰国民警卫队具有军事编制的地位。同时,乌克兰国民警卫队是具有执法职能的军事编制,隶属于乌克兰内务部系统;(2)乌克兰国家警察作为中央执行机关,属于安全和国防部门。同时,乌克兰“关于中央行政机关”的法律没有规定国家警察为中央行政机关;3)根据乌克兰“情报”法,情报界的主体是乌克兰的安全部门。然而,在乌克兰法律“乌克兰国家安全”第12条第2部分中,乌克兰安全局被定义为确保国家安全领域的一个独立机构。委员会指出,在国家安全领域保护人权的国家当局系统中双重指明同一机构在法律上是不合理的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信