Bacterial Pattern and Susceptibility of Antimicrobial Agents in Cancer Patient with Infection

M. Hasan, M. Begum, B. Begum, M. Islam, Saima Easin, M. Sarker, Abubakar Siddique
{"title":"Bacterial Pattern and Susceptibility of Antimicrobial Agents in Cancer Patient with Infection","authors":"M. Hasan, M. Begum, B. Begum, M. Islam, Saima Easin, M. Sarker, Abubakar Siddique","doi":"10.37545/haematoljbd.v2i02.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cancer patients are most vulnerable to develop infection during anticancer therapy which could be life threatening. Therefore, prompt administration of appropriate antimicrobial drug therapy is often essential to prevent mortality and morbidity in such patients. Spectrum of the infection causing organisms is continuously changing throughout the world along with their susceptibility to antimicrobials drugs. Aims: The aims of the study were to identify the bacterial pattern and their susceptibility to antimicrobials in cancer patients with infection and to help develop a guideline for the rational and appropriate use of antimicrobial in these patients. Materials and methods: It was an observational study conducted from January 2013 to December 2014 at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICRH), Mohakhali, Dhaka. We evaluated 517 blood and other specimens from cancer patients of both sexes and all ages under anticancer therapy suspected of having infection. Result: Blood culture was done in 53 patients of them 8 (15.09%) were proved to be culture positive. In case of urine and wound culture the rates of positivity were 37.79% & 73.98% respectively. In suspected cases culture for anaerobic organism was done but no such organism was found. Major isolated organisms in different cultures were E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas and Proteus. Imipenem, gentamicin, cotrimoxazole were the most sensitive antibiotics. However, in most cases amoxicillin, cephalexin and nalidixic acid were mostly resistant. Conclusion: Empirical use of amoxicillin or cephalexin is usually not useful and routine use of anaerobic culture is not necessary.","PeriodicalId":137283,"journal":{"name":"Haematology Journal of Bangladesh","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematology Journal of Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37545/haematoljbd.v2i02.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer patients are most vulnerable to develop infection during anticancer therapy which could be life threatening. Therefore, prompt administration of appropriate antimicrobial drug therapy is often essential to prevent mortality and morbidity in such patients. Spectrum of the infection causing organisms is continuously changing throughout the world along with their susceptibility to antimicrobials drugs. Aims: The aims of the study were to identify the bacterial pattern and their susceptibility to antimicrobials in cancer patients with infection and to help develop a guideline for the rational and appropriate use of antimicrobial in these patients. Materials and methods: It was an observational study conducted from January 2013 to December 2014 at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICRH), Mohakhali, Dhaka. We evaluated 517 blood and other specimens from cancer patients of both sexes and all ages under anticancer therapy suspected of having infection. Result: Blood culture was done in 53 patients of them 8 (15.09%) were proved to be culture positive. In case of urine and wound culture the rates of positivity were 37.79% & 73.98% respectively. In suspected cases culture for anaerobic organism was done but no such organism was found. Major isolated organisms in different cultures were E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas and Proteus. Imipenem, gentamicin, cotrimoxazole were the most sensitive antibiotics. However, in most cases amoxicillin, cephalexin and nalidixic acid were mostly resistant. Conclusion: Empirical use of amoxicillin or cephalexin is usually not useful and routine use of anaerobic culture is not necessary.
肿瘤感染患者抗菌药物的菌型及敏感性
癌症患者在抗癌治疗期间最容易发生感染,这可能危及生命。因此,及时给予适当的抗菌药物治疗对于预防此类患者的死亡率和发病率至关重要。在世界范围内,引起感染的生物体的频谱随着它们对抗菌素药物的易感性而不断变化。目的:本研究的目的是确定感染癌症患者的细菌类型及其对抗菌药物的敏感性,并帮助制定这些患者合理和适当使用抗菌药物的指南。材料与方法:这是一项观察性研究,于2013年1月至2014年12月在达卡Mohakhali国家癌症研究所和医院(NICRH)进行。我们评估了517份来自接受抗癌治疗的怀疑感染的癌症患者的血液和其他标本,这些患者不分性别和年龄。结果:53例患者行血培养,培养阳性8例(15.09%)。尿液和伤口培养阳性率分别为37.79%和73.98%。疑似病例进行了厌氧菌培养,但未发现厌氧菌。不同培养的主要分离菌为大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌、假单胞菌和变形杆菌。亚胺培南、庆大霉素、复方新诺明是最敏感的抗生素。然而,在大多数病例中,阿莫西林、头孢氨苄和萘啶酸大多耐药。结论:经验应用阿莫西林或头孢氨苄通常无效,常规应用厌氧培养无必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信