Narrative and Autobiographical Approaches to Leaving Religion

P. Stromberg
{"title":"Narrative and Autobiographical Approaches to Leaving Religion","authors":"P. Stromberg","doi":"10.1163/9789004331471_027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People leave religious institutions or change their religious beliefs for many different reasons. A person might change their religious affiliation because a political transformation has rendered that affiliation dangerous or economically undesirable; there may be some form of coercion involved. For example, the colonisation process with its attendant Christian missionisation entailed a massive replacement, on several continents, of indigenous religions with some version of Christianity. Did the people who abandoned indigenous religions deconvert? Of course, this is but one of many possible scenarios of religious change. A person might gradually abandon the faith in which they were raised, or might encounter a religious tradition that for one reason or another seems extraordinarily compelling, and for that reason leave her old faith for a new one. Whether all of these phenomena should be considered instances of deconversion is by no means resolved. Furthermore, the similarity between such instances of leaving religion may be only superficial, and thus a single theoretical framework—a single general explanation for all of these cases—may not be possible. For these reasons, writing coherently about leaving religion requires one to specify which sort of leaving is being explained. In most of the literature on leaving religion, the phenomenon is studied in the context of the contested ideological situations in contemporary societies (although important exceptions are found in Part 1 and 2 of this book). As Gooren (2011) notes, in practice the study of deconversion was shaped by its origins in the context of sociological study of new religious movements that arose in the early 1970s. Since that time the purview of the topic has expanded considerably, but it is fair to note that to some extent the concerns of these early studies established the paradigm in this literature. Above all—and Gooren’s (2010) thorough review and synthesis of the literature on conversion and disaffiliation makes this clear—across several","PeriodicalId":364665,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331471_027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

People leave religious institutions or change their religious beliefs for many different reasons. A person might change their religious affiliation because a political transformation has rendered that affiliation dangerous or economically undesirable; there may be some form of coercion involved. For example, the colonisation process with its attendant Christian missionisation entailed a massive replacement, on several continents, of indigenous religions with some version of Christianity. Did the people who abandoned indigenous religions deconvert? Of course, this is but one of many possible scenarios of religious change. A person might gradually abandon the faith in which they were raised, or might encounter a religious tradition that for one reason or another seems extraordinarily compelling, and for that reason leave her old faith for a new one. Whether all of these phenomena should be considered instances of deconversion is by no means resolved. Furthermore, the similarity between such instances of leaving religion may be only superficial, and thus a single theoretical framework—a single general explanation for all of these cases—may not be possible. For these reasons, writing coherently about leaving religion requires one to specify which sort of leaving is being explained. In most of the literature on leaving religion, the phenomenon is studied in the context of the contested ideological situations in contemporary societies (although important exceptions are found in Part 1 and 2 of this book). As Gooren (2011) notes, in practice the study of deconversion was shaped by its origins in the context of sociological study of new religious movements that arose in the early 1970s. Since that time the purview of the topic has expanded considerably, but it is fair to note that to some extent the concerns of these early studies established the paradigm in this literature. Above all—and Gooren’s (2010) thorough review and synthesis of the literature on conversion and disaffiliation makes this clear—across several
离开宗教的叙事和自传体方法
人们出于许多不同的原因离开宗教机构或改变宗教信仰。一个人可能改变自己的宗教信仰,因为政治变革使这种信仰变得危险或在经济上不受欢迎;可能会有某种形式的强迫。例如,伴随着基督教传教的殖民化过程,在几个大陆上,土著宗教被基督教的某些版本所大规模取代。那些放弃本土宗教的人改信宗教了吗?当然,这只是宗教变革的众多可能场景之一。一个人可能会逐渐放弃他们成长的信仰,或者可能会遇到一个宗教传统,由于这样或那样的原因,似乎非常令人信服,并因此放弃旧的信仰,转向新的信仰。是否所有这些现象都应被视为反反转的实例,这一点尚无定论。此外,这些脱离宗教的例子之间的相似之处可能只是表面上的,因此一个单一的理论框架——对所有这些例子的单一的一般解释——可能是不可能的。由于这些原因,连贯地写关于离开宗教的文章需要一个人具体说明哪一种离开是被解释的。在大多数关于离开宗教的文献中,这种现象都是在当代社会中有争议的意识形态情境的背景下研究的(尽管本书的第1部分和第2部分发现了重要的例外)。正如Gooren(2011)所指出的,在实践中,反解构研究的起源是在20世纪70年代初兴起的新宗教运动的社会学研究背景下形成的。从那时起,该主题的范围已经大大扩展,但公平地说,在某种程度上,这些早期研究的关注点建立了本文献中的范式。最重要的是,古伦(2010)对皈依和脱离的文献进行了全面的回顾和综合,这一点在几个方面都很清楚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信