Being in Uncertainties: An Inquiry-based Model Leveraging Complexity in Teaching-Learning

D. Rosen
{"title":"Being in Uncertainties: An Inquiry-based Model Leveraging Complexity in Teaching-Learning","authors":"D. Rosen","doi":"10.22191/nejcs/vol1/iss1/5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is traditionally structured as a closed system, privileging result-driven methods that offer control and predictability. In recent decades this reductionist approach has been effectively challenged by interdisciplinary work in complex systems theory, revealing myriad levels of orderly disorder that make either-or, linear instruction an inadequate norm. Narrowing the broad implications of a complexity lens on education, this paper focuses on generative uncertainty in teaching-learning, a paradoxical state of epistemological and creative growth described by English poet John Keats as \"the negative capability of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts.\" Opportunities to advance this potentiating capacity are especially abundant in constructivist curricula, for example the Methods of Inquiry (MoI) program discussed herein. MoI's open, complexitybased approach foregrounds uncertainty-tolerance and other interactive dispositions, providing a fluid structure for the emergent, often turbulent nature of meaning production. Such dynamic attitudes and strategies are seen as essential for any classroom practice that seeks to transform as well as inform, to guide and also empower.","PeriodicalId":184569,"journal":{"name":"Northeast Journal of Complex Systems","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Northeast Journal of Complex Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22191/nejcs/vol1/iss1/5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Education is traditionally structured as a closed system, privileging result-driven methods that offer control and predictability. In recent decades this reductionist approach has been effectively challenged by interdisciplinary work in complex systems theory, revealing myriad levels of orderly disorder that make either-or, linear instruction an inadequate norm. Narrowing the broad implications of a complexity lens on education, this paper focuses on generative uncertainty in teaching-learning, a paradoxical state of epistemological and creative growth described by English poet John Keats as "the negative capability of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts." Opportunities to advance this potentiating capacity are especially abundant in constructivist curricula, for example the Methods of Inquiry (MoI) program discussed herein. MoI's open, complexitybased approach foregrounds uncertainty-tolerance and other interactive dispositions, providing a fluid structure for the emergent, often turbulent nature of meaning production. Such dynamic attitudes and strategies are seen as essential for any classroom practice that seeks to transform as well as inform, to guide and also empower.
处于不确定之中:探究性教学模式的复杂性
传统上,教育是一个封闭的系统,注重结果驱动的方法,提供控制和可预测性。近几十年来,这种还原论的方法受到了复杂系统理论跨学科工作的有效挑战,揭示了无数层次的有序无序,使非此即彼的线性教学成为不充分的规范。缩小复杂性透镜对教育的广泛影响,本文将重点放在教学中的生成不确定性上,这是一种认识论和创造性成长的矛盾状态,被英国诗人约翰济慈描述为“处于不确定、神秘和怀疑中的消极能力”。提升这种增强能力的机会在建构主义课程中尤其丰富,例如本文讨论的探究方法(MoI)课程。MoI的开放、基于复杂性的方法强调了不确定性容忍和其他互动倾向,为突现的、通常是动荡的意义产生提供了一个流动的结构。这种动态的态度和策略被视为任何课堂实践的必要条件,以寻求改变,以及信息,指导和授权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信