New Evidence on the Institutional Causes of Economic Growth: Using Peer Pressure to Unbundle Institutions across Countries

Savva Shanaev, R. Wanjiru
{"title":"New Evidence on the Institutional Causes of Economic Growth: Using Peer Pressure to Unbundle Institutions across Countries","authors":"Savva Shanaev, R. Wanjiru","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3497642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a new framework of assessing the causal effect of institutions on economic growth via exploiting the exogenous variation in institutions triggered by “peer pressure” exerted on governments by other states, affecting policy decisions and the environment national and international businesses operate in. The applied method reinforces the importance of institutional factors for economic outcomes and allows to effectively address the data quality and instrument validity concerns surrounding earlier studies. Most importantly, the “peer pressure” method allows to distinguish between influences of various institutions, answering not only the question whether, but also which institutions do matter for growth. The study shows that the proposed method has significant power to “unbundle institutions” and finds that property rights protection and financial freedom are more important for growth than democracy, constraint on the executive, legal origins, or business freedom, even when controlled for human capital. The developed method has significant applicability in future research of institutional and cultural impact on international business and economic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":144069,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Institutional Change & Economic Growth (Topic)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Institutional Change & Economic Growth (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study presents a new framework of assessing the causal effect of institutions on economic growth via exploiting the exogenous variation in institutions triggered by “peer pressure” exerted on governments by other states, affecting policy decisions and the environment national and international businesses operate in. The applied method reinforces the importance of institutional factors for economic outcomes and allows to effectively address the data quality and instrument validity concerns surrounding earlier studies. Most importantly, the “peer pressure” method allows to distinguish between influences of various institutions, answering not only the question whether, but also which institutions do matter for growth. The study shows that the proposed method has significant power to “unbundle institutions” and finds that property rights protection and financial freedom are more important for growth than democracy, constraint on the executive, legal origins, or business freedom, even when controlled for human capital. The developed method has significant applicability in future research of institutional and cultural impact on international business and economic outcomes.
经济增长的制度原因的新证据:利用同侪压力拆解各国的制度
本研究提出了一个新的框架来评估制度对经济增长的因果效应,通过利用由其他国家对政府施加的“同伴压力”引发的制度的外生变化,影响政策决策以及国内和国际企业经营的环境。应用的方法强调了制度因素对经济结果的重要性,并允许有效地解决围绕早期研究的数据质量和工具有效性问题。最重要的是,“同伴压力”方法可以区分各种制度的影响,不仅回答了是否重要的问题,还回答了哪些制度对增长重要的问题。研究表明,所提出的方法具有“解除制度束缚”的强大力量,并发现产权保护和财务自由对增长比民主、对行政的约束、法律起源或商业自由更重要,即使在对人力资本进行控制的情况下也是如此。所开发的方法在未来研究制度和文化对国际商业和经济结果的影响方面具有重要的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信