{"title":"The performance of locking protocols in distributed databases","authors":"O. Wolfson","doi":"10.1109/ICDE.1987.7272381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of a locking protocol is to ensure correct interleaving of actions executed by concurrent transactions. The locking protocol consists of a set of rules dictating how accessed entities should be locked and unlocked. As a result of obeying the rules, transactions incur an overhead, particularly in a distributed database. We propose three measures for evaluating this overhead, each most suitable to a different type of underlying communication network. Then, using a graph theoretic model, we analyze and compare three protocols according to each measure: two-phase-locking ([EGLT]), two-phase-locking with a fixed order imposed on the database-entities (ensuring deadlock freedom), and the tree protocol ([SK]). The combined overhead of the locking protocol and the two phase commit protocol ([G]) is also determined.","PeriodicalId":145433,"journal":{"name":"1987 IEEE Third International Conference on Data Engineering","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1987 IEEE Third International Conference on Data Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.1987.7272381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The main purpose of a locking protocol is to ensure correct interleaving of actions executed by concurrent transactions. The locking protocol consists of a set of rules dictating how accessed entities should be locked and unlocked. As a result of obeying the rules, transactions incur an overhead, particularly in a distributed database. We propose three measures for evaluating this overhead, each most suitable to a different type of underlying communication network. Then, using a graph theoretic model, we analyze and compare three protocols according to each measure: two-phase-locking ([EGLT]), two-phase-locking with a fixed order imposed on the database-entities (ensuring deadlock freedom), and the tree protocol ([SK]). The combined overhead of the locking protocol and the two phase commit protocol ([G]) is also determined.