{"title":"Book Reviews: Leadership, Psychoanalysis, and Society Maccoby, Michael and Cortina, Mauricio (eds).","authors":"G. Wilke","doi":"10.1177/05333164221136412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This book provides an overview of the existing leadership literature and introduces its readers to an evidence-based approach to leaders, their character and followers. What is novel about this book is that it reads not like the usual collection of essays, where different authors have contributed chapters to a shared and overarching theme. Instead, it reads like a collection of scientific papers, that would perhaps be more at home in a journal. For an avid book reader, it takes time and effort to get used to this format.The achievement of the book is that it resists simply focusing on the leader’s personality traits or psychiatric symptoms. Throughout the book, the context, the followers and the leader are considered as connected. It was very pleasing for me, as an ex-associate at a business school, to get away from the leadership industry. Meaning, no fashionable movements like mindfulness, emotional intelligence, cha-risma or hero worship are pushed down the reader’s throat in this book. Nor is the ‘unholy trinity’ of strategy, permanent change and transformative leadership at the core of the contributions. A development which two colleagues and I castigated in a recent book called Breaking Free of the Bonkers (Binney, Glanfield and Wilke, 2017). In the same book we pointed out something important that is missing from the book under review: in a context of permanent transition in organizations, leadership is almost impossible, due to the obsessive defence against the chaos — micro-man-agement and controlling. In part one of the book, the reader is presented with a helpful summary of different ways of thinking about leadership and the underlying philosophy of the editors. They argue that leadership is context bound and therefore different situations and organizations require different qualities and skills from a leader. Equally, the examination of leaders requires an inter-disciplinary approach, if","PeriodicalId":166668,"journal":{"name":"Group Analysis","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05333164221136412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This book provides an overview of the existing leadership literature and introduces its readers to an evidence-based approach to leaders, their character and followers. What is novel about this book is that it reads not like the usual collection of essays, where different authors have contributed chapters to a shared and overarching theme. Instead, it reads like a collection of scientific papers, that would perhaps be more at home in a journal. For an avid book reader, it takes time and effort to get used to this format.The achievement of the book is that it resists simply focusing on the leader’s personality traits or psychiatric symptoms. Throughout the book, the context, the followers and the leader are considered as connected. It was very pleasing for me, as an ex-associate at a business school, to get away from the leadership industry. Meaning, no fashionable movements like mindfulness, emotional intelligence, cha-risma or hero worship are pushed down the reader’s throat in this book. Nor is the ‘unholy trinity’ of strategy, permanent change and transformative leadership at the core of the contributions. A development which two colleagues and I castigated in a recent book called Breaking Free of the Bonkers (Binney, Glanfield and Wilke, 2017). In the same book we pointed out something important that is missing from the book under review: in a context of permanent transition in organizations, leadership is almost impossible, due to the obsessive defence against the chaos — micro-man-agement and controlling. In part one of the book, the reader is presented with a helpful summary of different ways of thinking about leadership and the underlying philosophy of the editors. They argue that leadership is context bound and therefore different situations and organizations require different qualities and skills from a leader. Equally, the examination of leaders requires an inter-disciplinary approach, if
这本书提供了现有的领导文献的概述,并向读者介绍了一个基于证据的方法来领导,他们的性格和追随者。这本书的新颖之处在于,它读起来不像通常的散文集,不同的作者为一个共同的、总体的主题贡献了不同的章节。相反,它读起来像一本科学论文的合集,这可能更适合在期刊上发表。对于一个狂热的读者来说,习惯这种格式需要时间和精力。这本书的成就在于,它没有简单地关注领导者的性格特征或精神症状。在整本书中,上下文、追随者和领导者都被认为是相互联系的。作为一名商学院的前助理,我很高兴能离开领导力行业。也就是说,在这本书中,没有像正念、情商、魅力或英雄崇拜这样的时尚运动被强加给读者。战略、永久变革和变革型领导的“邪恶三位一体”也不是贡献的核心。我和两位同事在最近出版的一本名为《摆脱疯子》(Breaking Free of the Bonkers, Binney, Glanfield and Wilke, 2017)的书中严厉批评了这种发展。在同一本书中,我们指出了正在审查的书中遗漏的一些重要内容:在组织永久过渡的背景下,由于对混乱的过度防御——微观管理和控制——领导几乎是不可能的。在本书的第一部分,读者将看到对领导力的不同思考方式和编辑们的基本哲学的有益总结。他们认为,领导力是受环境约束的,因此不同的情况和组织需要领导者具备不同的品质和技能。同样,对领导人的考察也需要一种跨学科的方法