ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN SIFAT ALIRAN PADA MODEL 2D AXISYMMETRIC DENGAN MODEL 3D DENGAN METODE NUMERIK

Bina Teknika Pub Date : 2017-08-02 DOI:10.54378/bt.v12i2.78
Jooned Hendrarsakti, A. D. Prakoso, Donny Montreano
{"title":"ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN SIFAT ALIRAN PADA MODEL 2D AXISYMMETRIC DENGAN MODEL 3D DENGAN METODE NUMERIK","authors":"Jooned Hendrarsakti, A. D. Prakoso, Donny Montreano","doi":"10.54378/bt.v12i2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many previous studies of ejector have been conducted to understand and maximize the ejector performance. The study can be in form of experiments, analytical, and numerical simulation. The numerical simulation looks for the most effective and efficient effort and time in modeling flow process inside the ejector. Model simplification becomes one of solution in conducting simulation effectively. Three dimensional models in general are applied to an ejector that would be analyzed. These models can be compared to the simpler model, namely axisymmetric 2D model. The current study investigated the comparison between 3D and 2D models using numerical solution. Three types of ejectors from different application were used as the objects of the study. The analysis was conducted by comparing the qualitative and quantitative results. The results show that qualitatively the 2D axisymmetric model has good comparison to the 3D model. Quantitatively, 2D axisymmetric model has good similarity to 3D model for ejector performance parameters, such as entrainment ratio and Mach number with biggest difference of 5.7%. However, the velocity and pressure distribution have bigger discrepancies at both axial and radial directions at the area with extreme change, such as at throat nozzle. It can be concluded that the 2D axisymmetric model can be used as substitution of 3D model when the objective is only to obtain ejector performance and qualitative study.","PeriodicalId":441070,"journal":{"name":"Bina Teknika","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bina Teknika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54378/bt.v12i2.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many previous studies of ejector have been conducted to understand and maximize the ejector performance. The study can be in form of experiments, analytical, and numerical simulation. The numerical simulation looks for the most effective and efficient effort and time in modeling flow process inside the ejector. Model simplification becomes one of solution in conducting simulation effectively. Three dimensional models in general are applied to an ejector that would be analyzed. These models can be compared to the simpler model, namely axisymmetric 2D model. The current study investigated the comparison between 3D and 2D models using numerical solution. Three types of ejectors from different application were used as the objects of the study. The analysis was conducted by comparing the qualitative and quantitative results. The results show that qualitatively the 2D axisymmetric model has good comparison to the 3D model. Quantitatively, 2D axisymmetric model has good similarity to 3D model for ejector performance parameters, such as entrainment ratio and Mach number with biggest difference of 5.7%. However, the velocity and pressure distribution have bigger discrepancies at both axial and radial directions at the area with extreme change, such as at throat nozzle. It can be concluded that the 2D axisymmetric model can be used as substitution of 3D model when the objective is only to obtain ejector performance and qualitative study.
许多以前的研究都是为了了解和最大化喷射器的性能。研究可以采用实验、分析和数值模拟的形式。数值模拟的目的是寻找最有效的时间和精力来模拟喷射器内部的流动过程。模型简化成为有效进行仿真的解决方案之一。三维模型一般应用于要分析的喷射器。这些模型可以与更简单的模型,即轴对称二维模型进行比较。本研究利用数值解对三维和二维模型进行了比较。以三种不同用途的喷射器为研究对象。通过比较定性和定量结果进行分析。结果表明,二维轴对称模型定性上与三维轴对称模型具有较好的可比性。从数量上看,二维轴对称模型与三维模型在引射性能参数上有较好的相似性,如引射比和马赫数,最大差异为5.7%。然而,在变化剧烈的区域,如喉口处,速度和压力分布在轴向和径向上的差异较大。可以得出结论,当仅以获得喷射器性能和定性研究为目的时,二维轴对称模型可以代替三维模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信