Beyond Demographic Identifiers and Classification: A Search for Alternative Approaches to Quantitatively Evaluating Equity

G. Pai
{"title":"Beyond Demographic Identifiers and Classification: A Search for Alternative Approaches to Quantitatively Evaluating Equity","authors":"G. Pai","doi":"10.52214/cice.v25i1.10248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As interest in addressing issues of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) increases in the US and parts of Europe, this essay argues that the Western-centered interpretations of and approaches towards evaluating equity need to be more carefully examined to deem its cultural appropriateness. This essay reviews ways to conceive of equity and presents three alternative methodological approaches to quantitatively evaluating equity that do not require the Western convention of identification.","PeriodicalId":172586,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Comparative Education","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Comparative Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/cice.v25i1.10248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As interest in addressing issues of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) increases in the US and parts of Europe, this essay argues that the Western-centered interpretations of and approaches towards evaluating equity need to be more carefully examined to deem its cultural appropriateness. This essay reviews ways to conceive of equity and presents three alternative methodological approaches to quantitatively evaluating equity that do not require the Western convention of identification.
超越人口统计标识和分类:寻找定量评估公平的替代方法
随着美国和欧洲部分地区对解决多样性、公平和包容(DEI)问题的兴趣的增加,本文认为,需要更仔细地审查以西方为中心的对公平的解释和评估方法,以确定其文化适应性。这篇文章回顾了设想公平的方法,并提出了三种不需要西方识别惯例的定量评估公平的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信