Changes in Electricity Use following COVID-19 Stay-at-home Behavior

D. Brewer
{"title":"Changes in Electricity Use following COVID-19 Stay-at-home Behavior","authors":"D. Brewer","doi":"10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.dbre","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses hourly electricity consumption data from the PJM Interconnection in the United States and stay-at-home metrics from cell phone location data to study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on electricity consumption using a difference-in-predicted-differences strategy. I show that while in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic total electricity consumption declined by 2.7–3.8% relative to a predicted counterfactual, in June through August 2020 electricity consumption was 2.1–3.5% higher than the predicted counterfactual. Time spent at home reduces electricity consumption, and a reduction in time at home after May lead to increased electricity consumption in the summer months. In addition, higher temperatures had an increased effect on electricity consumption in 2020 relative to previous years. Nationwide monthly data on electricity consumption by load class reveals that commercial and industrial consumption was below its expected baseline from March-December 2020, while residential consumption was above its expected baseline, peaking in July. This suggests that increased demand for residential cooling offset declines in commercial and industrial demand for electricity. Estimates of the total effect of the pandemic on electricity consumption from March through December 2020 suggest that early reductions in electricity use were offset by later increases, implying that any expected \"silver lining” of decreased emissions from electricity generation may be smaller than previously thought. © 2023 by the IAEE. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":194500,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5547/2160-5890.12.1.dbre","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article uses hourly electricity consumption data from the PJM Interconnection in the United States and stay-at-home metrics from cell phone location data to study the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on electricity consumption using a difference-in-predicted-differences strategy. I show that while in the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic total electricity consumption declined by 2.7–3.8% relative to a predicted counterfactual, in June through August 2020 electricity consumption was 2.1–3.5% higher than the predicted counterfactual. Time spent at home reduces electricity consumption, and a reduction in time at home after May lead to increased electricity consumption in the summer months. In addition, higher temperatures had an increased effect on electricity consumption in 2020 relative to previous years. Nationwide monthly data on electricity consumption by load class reveals that commercial and industrial consumption was below its expected baseline from March-December 2020, while residential consumption was above its expected baseline, peaking in July. This suggests that increased demand for residential cooling offset declines in commercial and industrial demand for electricity. Estimates of the total effect of the pandemic on electricity consumption from March through December 2020 suggest that early reductions in electricity use were offset by later increases, implying that any expected "silver lining” of decreased emissions from electricity generation may be smaller than previously thought. © 2023 by the IAEE. All rights reserved.
COVID-19后居家行为的用电量变化
本文使用来自美国PJM互连的每小时用电量数据和来自手机位置数据的居家指标,采用差异预测差异策略研究COVID-19大流行对用电量的影响。我表明,虽然在2019冠状病毒病大流行的头几个月,总用电量相对于预测的反事实下降了2.7-3.8%,但2020年6月至8月的用电量比预测的反事实高出2.1-3.5%。在家的时间减少了用电量,而在家时间的减少可能会导致夏季用电量的增加。此外,与前几年相比,更高的温度对2020年电力消耗的影响更大。全国按负荷类别划分的月度用电量数据显示,2020年3月至12月,商业和工业用电量低于预期基线,而住宅用电量高于预期基线,并在7月达到峰值。这表明住宅制冷需求的增加抵消了商业和工业电力需求的下降。对2020年3月至12月大流行对用电量的总体影响的估计表明,早期用电量的减少被后来的增加所抵消,这意味着发电排放减少的任何预期的“一线希望”可能比以前想象的要小。©2023由IAEE。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信